Sri. N. M. Shivaramu v. Smt. T.R. Ramya
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:23498 | HC-KAR | WRIT PETITION NO. 46648 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) | High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru | Decided 02.07.2025 | Coram: Vijaykumar A. Patil, J. | Petitioner: Sri. N. M. Shivaramu (through GPA holder Smt. J. Sujatha; Adv. Nagesha B S) | Respondent: Smt. T.R. Ramya (Adv. Vinay D. Hosmath) | Challenge to order dated 10.7.2019 in R.A.No.9/2015 (Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mandya) rejecting I.A.No.II under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Outcome: writ petition dismissed as infructuous on memo of respondent's counsel; no merits adjudication | Statute referenced: Order 26 Rule 9 CPC.
What did the court decide?
On a memo filed by the learned counsel for the respondent stating that the captioned writ petition has become infructuous, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous; no adjudication on the merits of the challenge.