Writ petition filed seeking cancellation of PAN cards of respondents 2-4 and surrender of said cards. Petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach competent civil court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9681 WP No. 447 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 447 OF 2025 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPALA NAIDU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2025:KHC:9681 WP No. 447 of 2025
MARATHALLI, BENGALURU-560 037.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, AGA FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 TO R4 DISPENSED WITH, V/O. DATED 06.03.2025)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R- 1 TO CANCEL THE PAN CARDS OF THE R-1 TO 4 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS DTD 07.09.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
NC: 2025:KHC:9681 WP No. 447 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs:
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
counsel for respondent No.1 and perused the material on record. For the order proposed, notice to respondent Nos.2 to 4 is dispensed with.
3. After arguing the matter for some time, learned
counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be
NC: 2025:KHC:9681 WP No. 447 of 2025
disposed of as withdrawn, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to take recourse to such other remedies as available in law including approaching the competent Civil Court ventilating their grievance against respondent Nos.2 to 4 in accordance with law.
4. The aforesaid submission is placed on record.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn,
reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to recourse such remedies as available in law against respondent Nos.2 to 4 including approaching the competent Civil Court in accordance with law. In the event petitioners initiate appropriate proceedings against respondent Nos.1 as well as respondent Nos.2 to 4, respondent Nos.2 to 4 would be entitled to contest the said proceedings in accordance with law.
Sd/(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
DS CT: TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
J. LOKANATHA BABU NAIDU @ J BABU NAIDU
J.L. GOTHAM
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
S.R. KRIISHNA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
