Basavaraj Mallikarjun Yeragal v. Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Karnataka HC30 Oct 2025WP/4213/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (GM-RES) dismissed for non-compliance of office objection; Karnataka HC single-judge order (E.S. Indiresh, J., 30.10.2025) in WP No.4213 of 2023 by Basavaraj Mallikarjun Yeragal Developers seeking modification of interest portion of Karnataka RERA order dated 25.11.2022 in Complaint CMP/220329/0009288 and restoration of complaint; fifth listing, counsel absent, no genuine intent to pursue; Articles 226/227 certiorari; no merits considered.

What did the court decide?

Despite sufficient time having been granted, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objection; this non-compliance indicated that the petitioner had no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. ¶¶35

Basavaraj Mallikarjun Yeragal Vs Karnataka Real… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:43371 WP NO.4213 OF 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 30^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4213 OF 2023 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

BASAVARAJ MALLIKARJUN YERAGAL DEVELOPERS, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.107, NEELA GANGA NILAYA, NEAR ST.PETERS SCHOOL, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 056.

¶10

PRESENT OFFICE ADDRESS AT: NO.212, ARUNACHALAM LAYOUT, KOMMAGATTA, NEAR KENGERI SATELLITE CLUB, BENGALURU - 560 060. REGD. UNDER RERA ACT, 2016.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI. SURENDRA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶14

AND:

¶15

KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2^ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, BENGALURU - 560 027. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶16

PRASAD G. PUROHIT S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA, AGE: MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.107,

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:43371 WP NO.4213 OF 2023

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

SUVARNAMUKHI, 2^ND MAIN, JAGAJYOTHI NAGAR, KENCHANAPURA CROSS, BENGALURU - 560 056.

¶20

GOUTHAM RAJENDRA MEHTA LANDLORD-1 M/S PRITHWI AND CO. NO.9 AND 10, 3^RD FLOOR, SRI. PUTTANNACHETTY COMPLEX, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASANAGUDI, BENGLAURU - 560 004.

¶21

N. BIMAL KUMAR

¶22

M/S PRITHWI AND CO. NO.9 AND 10, 3^RD FLOOR, SRI. PUTTANACHETTY COMPLEX, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER TO MODIFY INTEREST PORTION OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 25^TH NOVEMBER, 2022 IN COMPLAINT NO. CMP/220329/0009288 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY; CONSEQUENTLY TO RESTORE THE COMPLAINT NO. CMP/220329/0009288 (ANNEXURE-A) BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO DISPOSE ON MERITS.

¶25

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH

¶27

¶28

NC: 2025:KHC:43371 WP NO.4213 OF 2023

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

ORAL ORDER

¶31

There is no representation for the petitioner.

¶32

This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for fifth

¶33

time for non-compliance of office objection.

¶34

Despite having been granted sufficient time,

¶35

learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objection. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter.

¶36

4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for

¶37

non-compliance of office objection.

¶38

Sd/(E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶39

ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

Basavaraj Mallikarjun Yeragal v. Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basavaraj Mallikarjun Yeragal v. Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Telecom Employees Co-Operative Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

M/S J P Enterprises Vs the Chief Manager/Authorised Officer

Telecom Employees Co-Operative Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

Naraindas Bodaram Vs Sunitha S. Bathija

Ms Komal K Dharamshi Vs Ms P B Divija

M/S Sharada Sugars Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Karnataka