Dismissed¶49

Gangamma v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Feb 2025WP/421/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ petition (Article 226/227, SCST matter) by Gangamma, Srinivas T. and Nagaraju seeking to set aside orders of the Deputy Commissioner dated 20.07.2021 (PTCL (REV) 05/2017-18) and 21.09.2020 (PTCL 05/2017-18) and of the Assistant Commissioner dated 19.04.2017; respondents included State revenue authorities and eight private individuals. Dismissed on 06.02.2025 solely for non-compliance of office objections, with counsel absent; merits untouched; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

In light of the Court's order dated 15.11.2024, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections, neither having been complied with nor the learned counsel for the petitioners being present. ¶49

Gangamma Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 421 OF 2024 (SCST)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

GANGAMMA

¶9

W/O. LATE THIMAIAH,

¶10

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS.

¶11

SRINIVAS T., S/O. LATE THIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.

¶12

NAGARAJU

¶13

S/O. LATE THIMAIAH,

¶14

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.

¶15

Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

ALL ARE R/AT BHOVI COLONY, NEAR GANGAMMANAHALLI, SIRA TOWN, TUMAKURU.

¶17

…PETITIONERS

¶18

(BY SRI. AMAR GOWDA K.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶19

AND:

¶20

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024

¶22

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKURU, TUMKURU DISTRICT.

¶23

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT.

¶24

TAHSILDAR SIRA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT.

¶25

BHEEMANA S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶26

ANKAMMA W/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶27

GEETHAMMA W/O. VIJAYANNA, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶28

RAGHAVENDRA S/O. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶29

SHIVAKUMAR. G S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶30

VIJAYANNA S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶31

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024

¶32

11. CHANDRIKA

¶33

W/O. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶34

BHARATI W/O. SHIVAKUMAR. G AGED ABOUT YEARS.

¶35

ALL ARE RESIDING AT SOPINATTI NEAR, BANIMANTAPA SIRA TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT.

¶36

…RESPONDENTS

¶37

(BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO 4)

¶38

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DATED 20.07.2021 IN PTCL (REV) 05/2017-18, AND IN PTCL 05/2017-18 DATED 21.09.2020 AND ORDER PASSED BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DATED 19.04.2017 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, B AND C AND ETC.

¶39

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶40

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶41

¶42

NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024

¶43

ORAL ORDER

¶44

This Court on 15.11.2024 passed the following order:

¶45