Judicial Department Employees House v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC writ petition dismissed as nothing surviving / spent; change of land use from agricultural to residential; MUDA (Mysore Urban Development Authority) meeting dated 12.03.2013; petitioner's application dated 11.06.2018; endorsement dated 23.06.2018 demanding documents at Sl.Nos.6 and 15; documents Sl.Nos.6 to 15 furnished; request sent to State Government for approval; mandamus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; Judicial Department Employees House Building Co-operative Society v. State of Karnataka Urban Development Department and MUDA; LB-RES category; single judge R. Nataraj; decision date 07.11.2025; no cases relied on; no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioner had furnished the documents at Sl.Nos.6 to 15 as stated in the endorsement dated 23.06.2018, and respondent No.2 had processed the papers and sent the petitioner's request for approval by the State Government — a position the petitioner's counsel did not dispute — nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition.