possession, directing defendant nos.2 to 15 to execute rectification deed correcting mistake crept in registration sale deed dated 09.11.1994 and also seeking decree of declaration and permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property. No relief is sought in the said suit against defendant no.16 i.e., BDA and it appears that defendant no.16 is only arraigned as a formal party in the suit. However, written statement on behalf of defendant no.16 was filed during the course of trial. After evidence of plaintiff and contesting defendant was completed, B Sreenivasa, Deputy Director of Town Planning, BDA has examined himself as DW.2. He was thereafter cross-examined on behalf of plaintiff. It is the case of defendant no.1 that during the course of cross-examination, DW.2 has made some admissions which are in favour of plaintiff and according to defendant no.1, DW.2 had entered the witness box only to favour the plaintiff and admissions made by him are deliberate. It is under these circumstances, I.A.Nos.61 to 63 were filed on behalf of defendant no.1 seeking to reopen the case and recall DW.2 for further cross-examination.
