Smt Meera Ramu v. Sri G v Ramesh

Karnataka HC19 Sept 2025WP/3616/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 3616 of 2022 (GM-CPC); Article 227 Constitution of India; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; underlying suit O.S.No.3965/2020 decreed on 29.04.2025; impugned order dated 07.02.2022 on IA.No.18 by XV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-3), Bengaluru; counsel's memo dated 19.09.2025; bench: Justice M.G.S. Kamal; decision date 19.09.2025; no case law relied upon; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous, in view of the memo dated 19.09.2025 filed by learned counsel for the petitioners recording that the underlying suit O.S.No.3965/2020 stood decreed vide judgment and decree dated 29.04.2025; the impugned order was not adjudicated upon. ¶¶46-¶47

Smt Meera Ramu Vs Sri G v Ramesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:37746 WP No. 3616 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3616 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT MEERA RAMU W/O LATE V K RAMU AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT B1 SRI SADAN APARTMENTS NEW NO 23, OLD NO.12 THIRUMURTHY STREET T NAGAR, CHENNAI - 600 017.

¶9

SRI R. KARTHIK S/O LATE V K RAMU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT B1 SRI SADAN APARTMENTS

¶10

Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

NEW NO 23, OLD NO.12 THIRUMURTHY STREET T NAGAR CHENNAI - 600 017.

¶12

SMT R SOWMYA D/O LATE V K RAMU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT B1

¶13

SRI SADAN APARTMENTS NEW NO 23, OLD NO. 12 THIRUMURTHY STREET T NAGAR CHENNAI - 600 017.

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC:37746 WP No. 3616 of 2022

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

(BY SMT. JACKLENE MASCARENHAS., ADVOCATE SRI. KIRAN V RON.,ADVOCATE)

¶19

AND:

¶20

SRI G V RAMESH

¶21

S/O LATE G VENKATRAYAYALU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO 165/B, 1ST CROSS, V R LAYOUT BASAVANAGUDI

¶22

BENGALURU - 560 004.

¶23

SRI BALAJI G P S/O G V PADMARAJAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO 472, 3^RD CROSS, 7^TH MAIN KATHRIGUPPE, BSK 3RD STAGE BENGALURU - 560 085.

¶24

SMT VIDYA BALAJI W/O BALAJI G P AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO 472, 3^RD CROSS, 7^TH MAIN KATHRIGUPPE BLOCK, BSK 3^RD STAGE BENGALURU - 560 085.

¶25

SRI B KRISHNA NAIDU S/O ASHWATHNARAYANA SETTY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO 26/2, 9TH MAIN KALAPPA BLOCK, SRINAGARA BENGALURU - 560 050.

¶26

SMT. B K PATHIBHARANI W/O B KRISHNA BABU

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:37746 WP No. 3616 of 2022

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO. 26/2, 9TH MAIN KALAPPA BLOCK, SRINAGARA BENGALURU - 560 050.

¶30

SRI D A LAKSHMINATH S/O LATE D ANANDAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT SAPTHAGIRI OIL TRADERS OPP RAGHAVENDRASWAMY TEMPLE DVG ROAD, BAGEPALLY- 561 207.

¶31

SMT. R SUMA W/O D A LAKSHMINATH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT SAPTHAGIRI OIL TRADERS OPP: RAGHAVENDRASWAMY TEMPLE DVG ROAD, BAGEPALLY- 561 207.

¶32

…RESPONDENTS

¶33

(BY SRI. NISHANTH A V.,ADVOCATE FOR R1

¶34

SRI. V.B. SHIVAKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 AND ALSO FOR R3 TO R7)

¶35

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.02.2022 PASSED ON IA.NO.18 IN O.S.NO.3965/2020 BY THE XV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-3), BENGALURU VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC.

¶36

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶37

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶38

¶39

NC: 2025:KHC:37746 WP No. 3616 of 2022

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

ORAL ORDER

¶42

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶43

dated 19.09.2025. Memo reads as under:

¶44

''The counsel for petitioner submits that the suit in OS No. 3965/2020 has been decreed vide judgment and decree dated 29.04.2025. Hence, in the view of the aforesaid Judgment and Decree the Writ Petition may be disposed of as infructuous. The may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity''

¶45

Memo is taken on record.

¶46

In view of the above, petition is dismissed as

¶47

having become infructuous .

¶48

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶49

RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

Smt Meera Ramu v. Sri G v Ramesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Meera Ramu v. Sri G v Ramesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S Sudesh Vs Syed Babajan

M/S Abhishek Developers Vs Smt Gowramma

Sri. B. N. Munivenkatappa Vs Sri. B. N. Muniraju

Smt Jayamma Vs Sri Nyatha Reddy

Marian Peres Bhatt Vs Sadananda Poojary

Tumkuru City Corporation Vs M/S Universal Transmission