Disposed¶34

Sri. Lakshmipathi v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2025WP/36068/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mutation of land records / pahani; Land Tribunal grant; representation dated 17-11-2024 (Annexure-F); index of land issued; Sy. No.56 - 17 guntas, Ramohalli Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk; Thasildar Bangalore South Taluk directed to consider representation within three months; Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; WRIT PETITION NO.36068 OF 2024 (KLR-RES); Justice E.S. Indiresh; disposed on 09-06-2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 (Thasildar, Bangalore South Taluk) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2024 (Annexure-F) within an outer limit of three months from receipt of certified copy of the order; writ petition disposed of. ¶34

Sri. Lakshmipathi Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:19356 WP No. 36068 of 2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 09^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.36068 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. LAKSHMIPATHI S/O LATE GALAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT RAMOHALLI VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560074.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. PARAMESHWARAPPA.,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

¶15

O/O ROOM NO.505, 5^TH FLOOR, GATE NO.3, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶16

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 009.

¶17

THE THASILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH THALUK OFFICE,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:19356 WP No. 36068 of 2024

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

KANDAYA BHAVAN, KG ROAD, BENGALURU -560009.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA)

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17-11-2024 AT VIDE (ANNEXURE-F) AND ACCORDINGLY ISSUE A DIRECTION TO MUTATE THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN SY. NO.56 MEASURING 17 GUNTAS SITUATED AT RAMOHALLI VILLAGE, KENGERI-2 HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents.

¶28

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶29

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:19356 WP No. 36068 of 2024

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

The grievance of the petitioner in this writ

¶32

petition is with regard to consideration of the representation dated 17.11.2024 (Annexure-F) to issue pahani in respect of the subject land which has been granted by the Land Tribunal.

¶33

It is also stated that, the respondentauthorities have issued index of land and in that view of the matter, the respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation dated 17.11.2024 (Annexure-F) made by the petitioner within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ

¶34

petition is disposed of .

¶35

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶36

¶37

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36

Sri. Lakshmipathi v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Lakshmipathi v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kum Kavya Vs the Government of Karnataka

Smt Lakshmamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Philip Stephen Vs the State of Karnataka

M.K. Chandrashekhara Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. N. S. Gangadhar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Veerabhadrappa Vs State of Karnataka