Dismissed¶30

Sri M G Manjunath v. Cheif Executive Officer

Karnataka HC27 Oct 2025WP/3584/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Justice R. Nataraj; WP No. 3584 of 2022 (LB-RES), decided 27.10.2025; M.G. Manjunath v. Chief Executive Officer, Taluk Panchayat, Ramanagara and others; withdrawal of writ petition via memo dated 10.10.2025; dismissal as withdrawn; challenge to notice dated 5.1.2019 under Articles 226/227 left undecided; notice to R3 and R4 dispensed with by order dated 01.12.2022; no costs; no merits ruling; useful only as procedural precedent on voluntary withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to the petitioner's memo dated 10.10.2025, without any adjudication on merits. ¶30

Sri M G Manjunath Vs Cheif Executive Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:42465 WP No. 3584 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3584 OF 2022 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. M.G. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE M.B. GURULINGAIAH MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT RAMANAGARA - 562 159.

¶13

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION RAMANAGARA - 562 159.

¶15

SMT. KHADER BI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS W/O LATE IBRAHIM SAHEB MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128.

¶16

SMT. NAHEEMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS C/O ARIF @ LATE IBRAHIM SAB MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KASAB HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:42465 WP No. 3584 of 2022

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

(BY SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R2; VIDE ORDER DATED 01.12.2022, NOTICE TO R3 AND R4 IS DISPENSED WITH)

¶22

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 5.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-1 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO AND ETC.,

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated

¶27

10.10.2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ

¶28

petition. The memo reads as under:

¶29

" The petitioner does not press the above writ petition and as such the petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to dismiss/withdraw the above writ petition without any order of cost in the interest of justice and equity."

¶30

In view of the memo, writ petition is dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn.

¶32

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶33

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Sri M G Manjunath v. Cheif Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri M G Manjunath v. Cheif Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gundappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Laguma Reddy Vs the Chief Secretary

Smt Ratnamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Subham International Social Service Trust Vs the Commissioner

Sri Robert Kennady Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Kanthilal Vs the Commissioner