Dismissed¶47

Smt Lalithamma v. Sri. G Venkataswamy

Karnataka HC27 Nov 2025WP/35775/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court 2025; NC: 2025:KHC:49470; WP No. 35775 of 2025 (GM-CPC); Article 227 writ petition; quashing of interlocutory order dated 04.03.2025 in OS No.353/2023, Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal; non-consideration of I.A.Nos.5, 6 and 7 (Annexure-A); dismissal as withdrawn at 'for orders' stage; liberty to file fresh suit subject to limitation; withdrawal of petition; no merits adjudication; single judge Pradeep Singh Yerur.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the writ petition and file a fresh suit, subject to limitation, if any. ¶47

Smt Lalithamma Vs Sri. G Venkataswamy — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:49470 WP No. 35775 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 35775 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT LALITHAMMA

¶9

D/O.LATE GULLAPPA AND LATE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶10

SMT. MEENAKSHAMMA D/O.LATE GULLAPPA AND LATE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

¶11

SMT. KANTHAMMA D/O LATE GULLAPPA AND LATE VENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶12

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH

¶13

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SRI. SAMPANGI S/O LATE GULLAPPA AND LATE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶15

SMT. KAVERI D/O, SAMPANGI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶16

SRI. VIJAY KUMAR S/O, SAMPANGI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

¶17

SMT. JAYALAKSHMI 2ND WIFE OF SAMPANGI,

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:49470 WP No. 35775 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

¶21

SMT. ARUNA D/O, SAMPANGI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶22

SRI. KEERTHI KUMAR S/O, SAMPANGI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

¶23

SMT. SUKHANYA D/O, LALITHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

¶24

SRI. LATE DILIP D/O, LALITHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, (DECEASED)

¶25

SMT. RENUKA D/O, MEENAKSHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

¶26

SRI. RAMESH S/O, MEENAKSHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶27

SRI. NAGARAJU S/O.MEENAKSHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,

¶28

SRI. LOKESH S/O, KANTHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT,

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:49470 WP No. 35775 of 2025

¶30

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

RAYASANDRA VILLAGE, HUSUR POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 099. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SRI.SRIKANTHA.M, SON OF MUNIYALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.85, GUNDUTHOPU, ANEKAL TALUK, RAYASANDRA VILLAGE, BANGALORE - 560 099.

¶33

…PETITIONERS

¶34

(BY SRI. ALLAH BAKASH M, ADVOCATE)

¶35

AND:

¶36

SRI. G VENKATASWAMY S/O LATE DODDA GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 42, GOUTHAM NAGAR, SULAKUNTE COLONY, DOMMASANDRA POST, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE - 562 125.

¶37

SRI. DR. G.MOHAN@ G.MUNIYAPPA, S/O, LATE, DODDA GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 1266, 22ND MAIN ROAD, 1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 087.

¶38

…RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSITTUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 04.03.2025 IN SUIT OS NO.353/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,

¶39

¶40

NC: 2025:KHC:49470 WP No. 35775 of 2025

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

ANEKAL, PORTION OF NON-CONSIDERING THE APPLICATIONS NAMELY I.A.NO.5, 6 AND 7 VIZ ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

¶43

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶44

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶45

ORAL ORDER

¶46

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh suit.

¶47

The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, subject to the limitation, if any.

¶48

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

¶49

HDK

¶50

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52

Smt Lalithamma v. Sri. G Venkataswamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Lalithamma v. Sri. G Venkataswamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Naseem Begum Vs Sri. Syed Khader

Sri v a Arogyaswamy Alias Arun Vs M/S Sycon Infra Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. Drakshayini. R Vs Sri. B. R. Ashwathnarayanappa

Mahendra Kumar Singhi Vs Mr. M Raja

Smt. Riyaz Unisa Vs Sri Syed Mubhashir

Sri Thimmareddy P Vs Simon S C