Dismissed¶56

Mrs. R. Leelavathi v. Mr. C.T. Nagaraja

Karnataka HC14 Mar 2025WP/34824/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ petitions (GM-FC) of 2015 between R. Leelavathi (wife/mother) and C.T. Nagaraja (husband/father) concerning G & WC No. 213/2013 before the II Additional Family Court, Bangalore; dismissed for non-prosecution on 14-03-2025 by Pradeep Singh Yerur, J., owing to lack of instructions, return of files by counsel (Prathima Anand for the mother; H.P. Leeladhar for the father) and apparent amicable settlement; liberty reserved to revive if unsettled; invoked Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; no cases cited; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the respective parties to agitate these matters in case they are not settled. ¶56

Mrs. R. Leelavathi Vs Mr. C.T. Nagaraja — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:10946 WP No. 34824 of 2015 C/W WP No. 23102 of 2015 WP No. 34664 of 2015

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 34824 OF 2015 (GM-FC)

¶7

C/W

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 23102 OF 2015 (GM-FC) WRIT PETITION NO. 34664 OF 2015 (GM-FC)

¶9

IN WP No. 34824/2015

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

MRS. R. LEELAVATHI W/O. C.T. NAGARAJA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, JOINT SECRETARY, RURAL PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPT., 3^RD FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SMT. PRATHIMA ANAND, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

MR. C.T. NAGARAJA S/O LATE THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.402, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE QUARTERS, BANGALORE-560 012.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(BY SRI. H.P. LEELADHAR, ADVOCATE)

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10946 WP No. 34824 of 2015 C/W WP No. 23102 of 2015 WP No. 34664 of 2015

¶20

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN G & WC NO.213/2013 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE AND ETC.

¶21

IN WP NO. 23102/2015

¶22

BETWEEN:

¶23

C.T. NAGARAJA S/O LATE THAMMIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.402, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE QUARTERS, BANGALORE 560 012

¶24

...PETITIONER

¶25

(BY SRI. LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE)

¶26

AND:

¶27

MRS. R. LEELAVATHI W/O C.T. NAGARAJA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/A 54-A, 'C' TYPE QTRS, III CROSS, 8^TH MAIN, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 052, WORKING AS JOINT SECRETARY DEPT. OF RURAL DEVT. & PANCHAYATHRAJ, 3^RD FLOOR, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE 560 001

¶28

...RESPONDENT

¶29

(BY SMT. PRATHIMA ANAND, ADVOCATE)

¶30

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

¶31

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10946 WP No. 34824 of 2015 C/W WP No. 23102 of 2015 WP No. 34664 of 2015

¶32

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN G & W[SC] NO. 213/13 FROM II ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE AND ETC.

¶33

IN WP NO. 34664/2015

¶34

BETWEEN:

¶35

MRS. R. LEELAVATHI, W/O. C.T. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, JOINT SECRETARY, RURAL PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, 3^RD FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

¶36

...PETITIONER

¶37

(BY SMT. PRATHIMA S.K., ADVOCATE)

¶38

AND:

¶39

MR. C.T. NAGARAJA, S/O. LATE THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.402, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE QUARTERS, BANGALORE-560 012.

¶40

...RESPONDENT

¶41

(BY SRI. H.P. LEELADHAR, ADVOCATE)

¶42

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN G & WC NO.213/2013 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE AND ETC.

¶43

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:10946 WP No. 34824 of 2015 C/W WP No. 23102 of 2015 WP No. 34664 of 2015

¶44

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶45

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶46

ORAL ORDER

¶47

Smt. Prathima Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner-mother and Sri H.P.Leeladhar, learned counsel for the respondent-father are present before this Court.

¶48

The matter is of the year 2015. Together they

¶49

submit that they have returned the respective files to their respective parties. There is no communication by the

¶50

parties to the learned counsels. It is also submitted that parties have settled the matter amicably.

¶51

This matter is being listed time and again.

¶52

However, as there is lack of instructions and communication from the respective parties to the respective counsels, there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the parties may have settled the matter

¶53

¶54

NC: 2025:KHC:10946 WP No. 34824 of 2015 C/W WP No. 23102 of 2015 WP No. 34664 of 2015

¶55

amicably and have not communicated the same to the respective counsels on record, who have admittedly returned the case papers to the parties. No other counsel has come on record representing the parties.

¶56

Under the circumstances, these matters are dismissed for non-prosecution . However, liberty is reserved to the respective parties to agitate these matters, in case, the matters are not settled.

¶57

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

¶58

PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28 CT:SNN

Mrs. R. Leelavathi v. Mr. C.T. Nagaraja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. R. Leelavathi v. Mr. C.T. Nagaraja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Mehraj Abdul Kareem Vs Mrs. Dilshad

Shashanka Vs Nagaraju P

Smt Yallavva Kumar Kandli @ Yallavva Vs Ramesh D.H.

Narayanaswamy M.V Vs Smt. Ashwini K .v

Sri. Sanjeev Kumar.G Vs Smt. Anitha Kumari

Smt. Snehal Dure P Vs Sri Sachin S