Miss. Ramola. U. S. v. Sri. B. I. Hemanth Kumar
Civil Procedure Code – Temporary/interim injunction – Effect of efflux of time on time-bound interim orders
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Pradeep Singh Yerur J, 07.11.2025) WP No.33446 of 2025 (GM-CPC) under Article 227: plaintiff in O.S. No.7598/2023 (defamation prohibitory injunction against 58 defendants incl. newspapers, TV channels, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, PTI) sought continuation of ad-interim ex parte temporary injunction dated 24.11.2023 granted under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC, which lapsed from 27.01.2025 due to inadvertent non-filing of the extension application; I.A. No.6 under Section 151 CPC posted for objections. HELD: time-bound interim orders do not cease to be effective by efflux of time and continue till recalled, vacated or modified or specifically ordered 'not extended' (following Centre of Excellence in Disaster Mitigation and Management v. S.K. Dynamics, 2016 SCC OnLine Utt 2234); trial Court directed to continue the interim order till disposal of I.A. No.6; no disobedience/contempt liability for the interregnum; no opinion on merits; Order XXXIX Rule 3(a) CPC notice returnable 17.01.2024.