Sri B S Lingaraju Vs the Commissioner

SRI. B.S. LINGARAJU S/O LATE SANGAPPA ARCHAKARU AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT. NEAR SRI BASAVANNA DEVARA DEVASTANA, BEESANAHALLI VILLAGE NADAVATHI POST JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK-562 114

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SHASHIDHARA N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ARUN ASHOK GADAG, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER THE DEPARTMENT OF KARNATAKA HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT

¶15

4^TH FLOOR, SHRI MINTO ANJINEYA BHAVAN ALURU VENKATRAO ROAD CHAMRAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018

¶16

THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 009

¶17

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 009

¶18

2 -

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:32749 WP No. 33273 of 2024

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

TAHSILDAR HOSKOTE TALUK HOSKOTE-562 114

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. SHWETA KRISHNAPPA, AGA)

¶24

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (a) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY ORDER OR DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 19.09.2022 (ANNEXURE-D) REPRESENTATION DATED 07.10.2023 (ANNEXURE-E) REPRESENTATION DATED 16.10.2023 (ANNEXURE-F), REPRESENTATION DATED 06.11.2023 (ANNEXURE-G) AND REPRESENTATION DATED 16.05.2024 (ANNEXURE-J) AND ETC.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶27

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶28

This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representations preferred by the petitioner.

¶29

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was appointed as the Archaka of the Shri. Basavanna God

¶31

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:32749 WP No. 33273 of 2024

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

Temple situated in Beesanahalli Village, Jadigenahalli Hobli, Hoskote Taluk and that his brother, one Mr.Shivaraju is interfering with his rights as Archaka. It is submitted that the petitioner preferred O.S. No.253/2024 before the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hoskote and that an order of ad-interim injunction had been granted on 31.07.2024.

¶34

Pointing out these aspects, the petitioner's preferred Annexures-D,E,F,G and J representations before respondent No.1 and seeks consideration of the same. It is submitted that respondent No.1 had issued Annexure-K communication dated 12.07.2024 requiring the District Commissioner, Bengaluru Rural to take immediate action on

¶35

the petitioner's representations. It is submitted that even though Annexure-K is dated 12.07.2024, nothing further has been done in the matter.

¶36

Having considered the contentions advanced, this writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the competent among the respondents to consider the representations preferred by the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is made clear that

¶37

4 -

¶38

NC: 2025:KHC:32749 WP No. 33273 of 2024

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

the petitioner's brother and any other persons directly interested in the dispute shall be put on notice and heard before orders are passed as directed.

¶41

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶42

RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Sri B S Lingaraju v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri B S Lingaraju v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Nataraj K Vs Pooja K

M/S. Fourses Foods Vs M/S. Karnataka Bank Limited

Mr. C. Jayagopal Vs Sree Charan Souhardha Sahakara Bank Niyamitha

Lily Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs Umesh K Patel

Mr K K Sharfuddin Vs the State of Karnataka

The Authorized Claim Settle Manager Vs Smt Geethamma