Disposed¶37

Kum. Saroja G.T v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Oct 2025WP/33243/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; WP No.33243 of 2024 (S-KSAT); disposed as infructuous; Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal Application No.5397/2024 interim order/stay refused; Social Welfare Department Deputy Director, Yadgir; petitioner Kum. Saroja G.T; respondent No.3 Sri S. S. Channabasappa; Articles 226 & 227 Constitution of India; coram B M Shyam Prasad and T.M. Nadaf JJ., order per B M Shyam Prasad J; decided 08-10-2025; NC: 2025:KHC:39676-DB; advocates Prithveesh M.K. (petitioner), Vikas Rojipura AGA (R1 & R2).

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the petition was disposed of as having become infructuous. ¶37

Kum. Saroja G.T Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:39676-DB WP No. 33243 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO.33243 OF 2024 (S-KSAT)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

KUM. SAROJA G.T D/O GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, WAS WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, YADGIR, YADGIR DISTRICT - 585 201 CURRENTLY WAITING FOR POSTING, RESIDING AT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE QUARTERS

¶13

YADGIR, YADGIR DISTRICT - 585 201

¶14

Digitally signed by MADHUSHREE H Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

(BY SRI. PRITHVEESH M K., ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

…PETITIONER

¶18

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,

¶19

2^ND FLOOR, VIAKSA SOUDHA , BENGALURU - 560 001

¶20

THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, M. S. BUILDING

¶21

¶22

NC: 2025:KHC:39676-DB WP No. 33243 of 2024

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

BANGALORE - 560 001

¶25

SRI S. S. CHANNABASAPPA

¶26

WAS WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION INSTITUTION SOCIETY, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 052 CURRENTLY POSTED AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT , YADGIR, YADGIR DISTRICT - 585 201

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA., AGA FOR R1 & R2; NOTICE TO R3 IS DISPENSED WITH)

¶29

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 7 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28/11/2024 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.5397/2024 BY HE HON'BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH (ANNEXURE-A) INSOFAR AS NON-GRANT OF THE INTERIM ORDER AS PRAYED FOR BY THE PETITIONER AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT THE INTERIM ORDER AS PRAYED FOR BY THE PETITIONER AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT THE INTERIM ORDER OF STAY AS PRAYED FOR BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NO.5397/2024 (ANNEXURE-B), TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE; c) PASS ANY OTHER ORDER, WHICH THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT, INCLUDING THE COST OF THE WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶30

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶32

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:39676-DB WP No. 33243 of 2024

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD)

¶36

Sri Prithveesh M.K., the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petition is rendered infructuous with the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal disposing of the petitioner's application on merits.

¶37

In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

¶38

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶39

Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

¶40

¶41

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43

Kum. Saroja G.T v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kum. Saroja G.T v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Honble Upa Lokayukta Vs Sri K G Manjunath

Nagaraja Srinivasa Rao Vs Reliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.

Sri K S Chandrashekar Vs the State of Karnataka