Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sri G Subramani Vs Smt R Chitala Sudarshan — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
Sri G Subramani Vs Smt R Chitala SudarshanSri G Subramani v. Smt R Chitala Sudarshan

Dismissed¶26

Sri G Subramani v. Smt R Chitala Sudarshan

Karnataka HC9 Sept 2025WP/3306/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

NC: 2025:KHC:35749 | WP No. 3306 of 2021 (GM-CPC) | High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru | Dr. Justice K.Manmadha Rao | decided 09-09-2025 | Article 227 of the Constitution of India | execution proceedings Ex.No.123/2013 | LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru | order dated 30.01.2021 (Annexure-H); entire proceedings (Annexure-F) | withdrawal on settlement between parties; memo taken on record | petition dismissed as withdrawn | petitioner: Sri G Subramani (adv. Sri H Jayarama Shetty) | respondent: Smt R Chitala Sudarshan (adv. Sri T.Prakash).

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition. ¶26

Why is it important?

As the parties had entered into a settlement and nothing survived for consideration, the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel was taken on record and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶26

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the petition.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petition should be permitted to be withdrawn in view of the settlement entered into between the parties.

Ratio / Principle

As the parties had entered into a settlement and nothing survived for consideration, the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel was taken on record and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Karnataka, Writ Petition No. 3306 of 2021 (GM-CPC) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India — G Subramani v. R Chitala Sudarshan. The petition sought to quash the order dated 30.01.2021 in Ex.No.123/2013 (Annexure-H) and the entire pending execution proceedings (Annexure-F) before the LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. When the matter came up for orders, the petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating that, in view of a settlement between the parties, nothing survived for consideration, and sought leave to withdraw the petition. The memo was taken on record and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Decided on 09.09.2025 by Dr. Justice K.Manmadha Rao.

A

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:35749 WP No. 3306 of 2021

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION NO. 3306 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI G SUBRAMANI S/O LATE R GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.517, 10TH C MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. H JAYARAMA SHETTY.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

SMT R CHITALA SUDARSHAN D/O LATE M S PRAGASAM AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT NO.213, SWISS TOWN BELLARY ROAD, HOLYWOOD JUNCTION SADAHALLI GATE, DODDAJALA POST BENGALURU -562157

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T.PRAKASH., ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ORDER PASSED THE LEARNED LXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN EX.NO.123/2013 DATED 30.01.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-H CONSEQUENTLY, QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN EX.NO.123/2013 PENDING ON THE FILE OF LEARNED LXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU DATED 30.01.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-F.

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:35749 WP No. 3306 of 2021

HC-KAR

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that in view of the settlement entered into between the parties, nothing survives for consideration and seeks

permission of the court to withdraw the petition.

Memo is taken on record.

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/(DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE

SS

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the petition should be permitted to be withdrawn in view of the settlement entered into between the parties.medium confidence¶24

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Constitution of IndiaArticle 227¶16

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 30.01.2021 in Ex.No.123/2013 (Annexure-H) passed by the LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, which the writ petition prayed to quash¶16
LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru · 30.01.2021
Prior proceeding
Execution proceedings in Ex.No.123/2013 pending before the LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Annexure-F), which the petition also sought to have quashed in entirety¶16

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
SRI G SUBRAMANI S/O LATE R GOVINDASWAMY¶9
SRI. H JAYARAMA SHETTY
respondent
SMT R CHITALA SUDARSHAN D/O LATE M S PRAGASAM¶14
SRI. T.PRAKASH

Coram

AI extract

K.MANMADHA RAOauthor¶21

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 9 Sept 2025 · September
Registered: 15 Feb 2021
Case no.: WP/3306/2021
CNR: KAHC010073002021
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: K.manmadha Rao
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: Writ Petition (GM-CPC)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.manmadha Rao

Shivaprasad Vs Raziya Begum
8 Sept 2025
Shantarama Hegdekatte Vs Sri Srinivas
8 Sept 2025
Sri Somsundar R @ Somashekar Vs Sri K Abdul Salam
8 Sept 2025
R Nagaraja Vs Sannathimmakka
9 Sept 2025
Mr Joby Paul a Vs Yellappa
9 Sept 2025
Sri T R Ananda Vs State of Karnataka
9 Sept 2025

Cite this judgement

Sri G Subramani v. Smt R Chitala Sudarshan, WP/3306/2021 (KA), decided on 9 September 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Constitution of IndiaArticle 227

View all statutes

Procedural history2

Order dated 30.01.2021 in Ex.No.123/2013 (Annexure-H) passed by the LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, which the writ petition prayed to quashLXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru · 30.01.2021
Execution proceedings in Ex.No.123/2013 pending before the LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Annexure-F), which the petition also sought to have quashed in entirety

View full history

Bench / Coram

K.MANMADHA RAO

Parties & counsel