Dismissed¶26

Sri. Y M Yathish v. Smt. Renukamma

Karnataka HC19 Nov 2025WP/33050/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, Bengaluru; Justice S Vishwajith Shetty; 19 November 2025; WP No. 33050 of 2024 (GM-CPC); Article 227 Constitution of India; O.S.No.258/2017, Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC Magadi; IA No.VII under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for court commissioner to fix boundaries rejected by order dated 02.01.2024; A-CRP under Section 115 CPC; petition rendered infructuous; dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's memo; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

The submission that the writ petition had been rendered infructuous and the memo filed to that effect were taken on record, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶26

Sri. Y M Yathish Vs Smt. Renukamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:47836 WP No. 33050 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 33050 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI Y.M. YATHISH S/O MASTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.20/20 ANNAPURNESHWARINAGARA NAGARBHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 072.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI SADHANA S DESAI, ADV.)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SMT. RENUKAMMA W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT HONNAGANAHATTI VILLAGE, TAVARKERE HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 562 130.

¶16

SRI UGRA NARASIMHAIAH S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE TAVARKERE VILLAGE AND HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK 562 130.

¶17

SRI D. SIDDARAJU S/O LATE DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI TAVARAKERE BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 130.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC:47836 WP No. 33050 of 2024

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO. 258/2017 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI.SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 02.01.2024 PASSED PRODUCED AT ANNX-A AND CONSEQUENTLY APPOINT A COURT COMMISSIONER TO SURVEY AND VERIFY AND FIX THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.A-CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 2.01.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.VII IN OS NO.258/2017 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI., REJECTING THE IA NO.VII FILED UNDER ORDER XXVI RULE-9 OF CPC., FOR APPOINT COURT COMMISSIONER.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition does not survive for consideration as the same has been rendered infructuous. She has filed a memo to the said effect.

¶26

Submission made and the memo filed are taken on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

Sd/(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶28

Sri. Y M Yathish v. Smt. Renukamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Y M Yathish v. Smt. Renukamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N Mani Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S. Skyline Construction and Housing Pvt. Ltd., Vs M/S. Chawla Interbild Construction Company Pvt. Ltd.

Radha Vs Muniyamma

M/S Sri Lakshmi Venkateshwara Timbers Vs M/S Shri Lakshmi Venkataramana

Sri Mehboob Khan @ Naseem Ulla Khan Vs State of Karnataka

Sri T Venkataramanappa Vs Sri Shivappa