Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Prashant Tripathi Vs the State of Karnataka — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
Prashant Tripathi Vs the State of KarnatakaPrashant Tripathi v. the State of Karnataka

Dismissed¶¶49

Prashant Tripathi v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC29 Aug 2025WP/28970/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 28970 of 2024 (GM-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:33601; B M Shyam Prasad, J.; decided 29-08-2025; petition DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on withdrawal memo by petitioners 1 and 2; subject matter: enforcement of K-RERA orders/judgments (Complaint No. CMP/2002217/0005418 dated 26.10.2023; Complaint No. CMP/220725/0009807 dated 04.09.2023), execution orders and revenue recovery certificate against Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Private Limited; Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2016; no cases cited; no substantive holdings; no quantum stated.

What did the court decide?

Following a memo for withdrawal filed by the learned counsel for petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 (who stated they did not intend to proceed and wished to modify/amend the annexures sought to be enforced), the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issue was adjudicated.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether respondents 1 to 4 (revenue authorities) could be directed to enforce payment of amounts due from respondent 6 (Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Private Limited) by implementing the K-RERA orders, execution orders and revenue recovery certificate under the recovery procedure in the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 read with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2016.

Ratio / Principle

Following a memo for withdrawal filed by the learned counsel for petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 (who stated they did not intend to proceed and wished to modify/amend the annexures sought to be enforced), the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issue was adjudicated.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by three individual petitioners seeking directions to respondents 1 to 4 (Deputy Commissioner/Tahasildar, Bengaluru Urban District and Deputy Commissioner/Tahasildar, Devanahalli, Bangalore Rural) to enforce payment of amounts due from respondent 6, Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Private Limited, by implementing the orders of respondent 5, K-RERA — final judgments in Complaint No. CMP/2002217/0005418 dated 26.10.2023 and Complaint No. CMP/220725/0009807 dated 04.09.2023 (Annexure-A series), execution orders (Annexure-B series) and revenue recovery certificate (Annexure-C series) — under the recovery procedure in the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 read with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2016. Before adjudication, counsel for petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 filed a memo for withdrawal, recording that they did not intend to proceed and wished to modify/amend the annexures sought to be enforced. The Court (B M Shyam Prasad, J.), by oral order dated 29.08.2025, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive ruling was rendered.

A

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:33601 WP No. 28970 of 2024

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 28970 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

PRASHANT TRIPATHI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

TRIPTI TRIPATHI

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/O B301, CONDORDE WINDRUSH, RAMASAGAAR VILLAGE HEELALIGE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560100

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka

MALLIKARJUNA REDDY G R AGED ABOUT 46 R/O NO. 75, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, A SECTOR, MUNESHWARA BLOCK, AMRUTHANAGARA, SAHAKARNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 092.

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. REYNOLD D SOUZA, ADVOCATE)

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:33601 WP No. 28970 of 2024

HC-KAR

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009.

THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

TAHASILDAR DEVANAHALLI BANGALORE RURAL TALUK PANCHAYATH OFFICE DEVANAHALLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE - 562 110.

KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, 2^ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBLI BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 027.

OZONE URBANA INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER

3 -

NC: 2025:KHC:33601 WP No. 28970 of 2024

HC-KAR

COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.38, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MANGAING DIRECTOR VASUDEVAN SATHYAMOORTHY.

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 3RD GATE, 5TH FLOOR, MS BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 AND R7

SRI. GAUTHAM DEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R5 SMT. P.L. VANDANA, ADVOCATE FOR R6)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1, 2, 3 AND 4 TO ENFORCE PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE FROM R-6 BY IMPLEMENTING THE SAID ORDERS ISSUED BY R-5 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERY PROVIDED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND RULES THEREUNDER READ ALONG WITH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2016 AND RULES THEREUNDER, FOR ENFORCEMENT AND

4 -

NC: 2025:KHC:33601 WP No. 28970 of 2024

HC-KAR

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIONS OF R-5 K- RERA UNDER ANNX-C SERIES WHICH IS REVENUE RECOVERY CERTIFICATE, EXECUTION ORDERS IN ANNX-B SERIES AND COMPLY WITH THE K-RERA FINAL ORDER / JUDGEMENT AT ANNX-A SERIS WHICH IS K-RERA JUDGMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO.CMP/2002217/0005418 AND CMP/220725/0009807 DATED 26.10.2023 AND 04.09.2023 RESPECTIVELY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners files a

memo for withdrawal which reads as under:

"Herein the Counsel for the Petitioner No.1 and 2 would submit here in as under as per the instructions of Petitioner no.1 and 2 that the intended parties do not intend to go ahead with the proceedings of this case in the above said matter be withdrawn and liberty be granted to approach this Hon'ble authority for the same relief in case the petitioners seek the same relief. It is also instructed by petitioners no 1 and 2 that they seek to modify and make amends to the Annexure which has been prayed to be

NC: 2025:KHC:33601 WP No. 28970 of 2024

5 -

HC-KAR

enforced/implemented by this Hon'ble Court in this case. Hence the same may be kindly be considered by this Hon'ble Court and the Petitioners No.1 and considered to be withdrawn."

In the light of the afore, the petition stands

dismissed as withdrawn.

SD/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

YN. List No.: 4 Sl No.: 4

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether respondents 1 to 4 (revenue authorities) could be directed to enforce payment of amounts due from respondent 6 (Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Private Limited) by implementing the K-RERA orders, execution orders and revenue recovery certificate under the recovery procedure in the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 read with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2016.medium confidence¶¶34

Statutes considered

4 provisions across 4 enactments

AI extract

Constitution of IndiaArticles 226 and 227¶¶34
Karnataka Land Revenue ActKARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964¶¶34
Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2016REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2016¶¶34
Companies ActCOMPANIES ACT, 1956¶¶27

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
K-RERA (respondent 5) passed final orders/judgments in Complaint No. CMP/2002217/0005418 dated 26.10.2023 and Complaint No. CMP/220725/0009807 dated 04.09.2023 (Annexure-A series), which the petitioners sought to have enforced.¶¶38
Prior proceeding
Pursuant to the K-RERA judgments, execution orders (Annexure-B series) and a Revenue Recovery Certificate (Annexure-C series) were issued, whose implementation by the revenue authorities the petitioners sought.¶¶38

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
PRASHANT TRIPATHI¶¶9
REYNOLD D SOUZA
petitioner
TRIPTI TRIPATHI¶¶10
REYNOLD D SOUZA
petitioner
MALLIKARJUNA REDDY G R¶¶14
REYNOLD D SOUZA
respondent
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT¶¶20
NAVYA SHEKHAR
respondent
THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK¶¶21
NAVYA SHEKHAR
respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT¶¶22
NAVYA SHEKHAR
respondent
TAHASILDAR DEVANAHALLI¶¶23
NAVYA SHEKHAR
respondent
KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN¶¶24
GAUTHAM DEV C. ULLAL
respondent
OZONE URBANA INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED¶¶25
P.L. VANDANA
respondent
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT¶¶30
NAVYA SHEKHAR

Coram

AI extract

B M SHYAM PRASADauthor¶¶39

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 29 Aug 2025 · August
Registered: 26 Oct 2024
Case no.: WP/28970/2024
CNR: KAHC010599632024
Topic: Company and Corporate
Bench: B M Shyam Prasad
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: Writ Petition (GM-RES)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B M Shyam Prasad

Yahavantha S Vs Hindustal Petroleum Corproation Limited
28 Aug 2025
Sri v Janardhan Vs the State of Karnataka
28 Aug 2025
Mr. Santhosh. O. G. Vs the Union of India
28 Aug 2025
Sagayaraj @ Raju Vs the Secretary
29 Aug 2025
Abdul Samad @ Samad Vs State of Karnataka
29 Aug 2025
Thanujamma S Vs the State of Karnataka
29 Aug 2025

Cite this judgement

Prashant Tripathi v. the State of Karnataka, WP/28970/2024 (KA), decided on 29 August 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes4

Constitution of IndiaArticles 226 and 227
Karnataka Land Revenue ActKARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964
Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2016REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2016
Companies ActCOMPANIES ACT, 1956

View all statutes

Procedural history2

K-RERA (respondent 5) passed final orders/judgments in Complaint No. CMP/2002217/0005418 dated 26.10.2023 and Complaint No. CMP/220725/0009807 dated 04.09.2023 (Annexure-A series), which the petitioners sought to have enforced.
Pursuant to the K-RERA judgments, execution orders (Annexure-B series) and a Revenue Recovery Certificate (Annexure-C series) were issued, whose implementation by the revenue authorities the petitioners sought.

View full history

Bench / Coram

B M SHYAM PRASAD

Parties & counsel