Dismissed¶38

Smt. Suma v. the Commandant

Karnataka HC23 Oct 2025WP/28233/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru | WP No. 28233 of 2025 (S-RES) | Justice Ashok S. Kinagi | 23-10-2025 | Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue grievance before appropriate forum | Certiorari sought under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India, to quash endorsement of Commandant, 4th Battalion K.S.R.P., Koramangala, Bengaluru, No. SIBBANDI(1)SWA.NI./54/2000-01 dated 02.01.2025 (Annexure-A) | Petitioners: Suma, Megha S M, Shreyas Yadav (family of Late Marichitthaiah, Ramanagara) | Respondents: Commandant KSRP; Smt. Radhamma W/o Bylaraj | Counsel: Maheshkiran Shetty S | Keywords: writ petition withdrawal, endorsement, KSRP, sibbandi, certiorari, Articles 226 227.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to initiate their grievance before the appropriate forum in the appropriate proceedings. ¶38

Smt. Suma Vs the Commandant — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty to initiate their grievance before the appropriate forum in the appropriate proceedings.

¶38

Issue for consideration

Whether the endorsement issued by respondent No.1 (the Commandant, 4th Battalion, K.S.R.P., Koramangala, Bengaluru) bearing No. SIBBANDI(1)SWA.NI./54/2000-01 dated 02.01.2025, vide Annexure-A, ought to be quashed, as prayed for by the petitioners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. (Note: the petition was withdrawn before any adjudication of this issue.)

¶27

Ratio / Principle

The Court took on record the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to initiate their grievance before the appropriate forum in the appropriate proceedings.

¶37

Key takeaways

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, i.e., liberty to initiate the petitioners' grievance before the appropriate forum in the appropriate proceedings.ratio¶38

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, single bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi, order dated 23 October 2025 in WP No. 28233 of 2025 (S-RES). Petitioners Smt. Suma (W/o Late Marichitthaiah), Smt. Megha S M (D/o Late Marichitthaiah) and Shreyas Yadav (S/o Late Marichitthaiaha), all residing at Srigiripura, Ramanagara, had filed the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for certiorari to quash the endorsement issued by respondent No.1, the Commandant, 4th Battalion, K.S.R.P., Koramangala, Bengaluru, bearing No. SIBBANDI(1)SWA.NI./54/2000-01 dated 02.01.2025, vide Annexure-A; respondent No.2 was Smt. Radhamma W/o Bylaraj. Coming on for preliminary hearing, the Learned Government Advocate accepted notice for respondent No.1; after arguing for some time, petitioners' counsel Sri Maheshkiran Shetty S filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to initiate the grievance before the appropriate forum in the appropriate proceedings. The memo was taken on record and the Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No adjudication on merits; no precedent cited; no quantum involved.

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:41816 WP No. 28233 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 28233 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. SUMA

¶11

W/O LATE MARICHITTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶12

SMT. MEGHA S M

¶13

D/O LATE MARICHITTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS

¶14

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SHREYAS YADAV

¶16

S/O LATE MARICHITTHAIAHA

¶17

AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT TUMKURU ROAD CHITHRALINGESHWARA TEMPLE OPPOSITE SRIGIRIPURAGOLLARAHATTI SRIGIRIPURA, RAMANAGARA - 561 101.

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI. MAHESHKIRAN SHETTY S, ADVOCATE)

¶20

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:41816 WP No. 28233 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

AND:

¶23

THE COMMANDANT

¶24

4TH BATTALLION, K.S.R.P, KORMANGALA BENGALLURU - 560 030.

¶25

SMT. RADHAMMA W/O BYLARAJ AGE ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT KAKOL POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH - 560 089.

¶26

…RESPONDENTS

¶27

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 THE COMMANDANT, 4TH BATTALLION, K.S.R.P. KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU BEARING NO. SIBBANDI(1)SWA.NI./54/2000-01 DATED 02.01.2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶30

¶31

NC: 2025:KHC:41816 WP No. 28233 of 2025

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.1.

¶35

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for

¶36

the petitioners filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to initiate their grievance before the appropriate forum in the appropriate proceedings.

¶37

The memo is taken on record.

¶38

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶39

withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶40

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶41

SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20 CT: BHK

Smt. Suma v. the Commandant

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Suma v. the Commandant

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. M. Shankare Gowda Vs the State of Karnataka

The Karnataka Lokayukta Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Channabasappagowda Vs Sri. M v Pradeepa

Sri Shekaraiah Vs State of Karnataka

Sukrutha Pre University Independent College Vs B. P. Prema

Sri Shivamurtheppa Vs Mallappa @ Malleshappa