Disposed¶30

Quicloc Private Ltd. Workers Union v. the Management of Quicloc Private Limited

Karnataka HC12 Nov 2025WP/2762/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (NC: 2025:KHC:45970) writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by Quicloc Private Ltd., Workers Union against the Management of Quicloc Private Limited; disposed of on 12-11-2025 in terms of a joint memo recording amicable settlement of the dispute; pending interlocutory applications disposed of and interim directions discharged; coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti M; petitioner's counsel: Guruprasad (for A.J. Srinivasan); respondent's counsel: Somashekar.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo; pending interlocutory applications, if any, disposed of and interim directions, if any, discharged. ¶30

Quicloc Private Ltd. Workers Union Vs the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:45970 WP No. 2762 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 2762 OF 2020 (L-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

QUICLOC PRIVATE LTD., WORKERS UNION, REPRESENTED BY ITS, GENERAL SECRETARY, JYOTHI BASU BHAVAN, NO.20, WEST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, OPP. BMS WOMENS COLLEGE, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. GURUPRASAD., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.J. SRINIVASAN., ADVOCATE)

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N

¶13

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

AND:

¶15

THE MANAGEMENT OF QUICLOC PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, NO.132/52, GD HOUSE, BENDRE NAGAR, SUBRAMANYAPRUA MAIN ROAD, BANASHANKARI 2^ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 070.

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR., ADVOCATE)

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:45970 WP No. 2762 of 2020

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Sri.Guruprasad., counsel on behalf of Sri.A.J.Srinivasan.,

¶25

counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person.

¶26

Sri.Somashekar., counsel for the respondent has

¶27

appeared through video conferencing.

¶28

Counsel for the respective parties jointly submits that the parties have resolved the dispute amicably and accordingly, a joint memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the joint memo. Counsel therefore, submits that the joint memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo.

¶29

The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties and the joint memo is placed on record.

¶30

The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint memo.

¶31

¶32

NC: 2025:KHC:45970 WP No. 2762 of 2020

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, pending

¶35

interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim

¶36

direction if any stands discharged.

¶37

SD/(JYOTI M) JUDGE

¶38

TKN,KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1.1

Quicloc Private Ltd. Workers Union v. the Management of Quicloc Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Quicloc Private Ltd. Workers Union v. the Management of Quicloc Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karnataka Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Vs Karnataka Plantation Staff & General

City Municipal Council Doddaballapura Vs the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-Ii

Sri Mahadeva Vs the Department of Urban Development

Sri K B Gadigeppa Vs the Chief Traffic Manager

Sri B Shivanna Since Dead by His Lrs Smt Mangala Vs the Senior Divisional Controller

B Venkatesh Vs the Chief Accounts Officer