M/S Rosmerta Technologies Limited v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Nov 2025WP/26788/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, single judge (Suraj Govindaraj J.), 17-11-2025; Rosmerta Technologies Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (Transport Department) and Department of Transport and Road Safety; writ petition under Articles 226/227 challenging tender notifications TD/2024-25/SE0077, SE0078, SE0081 (dt. 19.02.2025) and TD/2025-26/SE0101, SE0102 (dt. 25.07.2025); withdrawn via counsel's memo before preliminary hearing; dismissed as withdrawn; no merits decided, no precedent value on tender validity.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's instance pursuant to a memo filed by its counsel seeking liberty to challenge the new tender in case of dispute. ¶35-36

M/S Rosmerta Technologies Limited Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:47111 WP No. 26788 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 26788 OF 2025 (GM-TEN)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S. ROSMERTA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 402, 4TH FLOOR, WORLD TRADE TOWER, BARAKHAMBHA LANE, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. C. NAGESH KUMAR.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. NISHAN G.K, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 125, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD GATE, M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SAFETY REPRESENTED BY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER I FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, T.T.M.C. BUILDING, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, AGA)

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:47111 WP No. 26788 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION SETTING ASIDE THE TENDER NOTIFICATIONS BEARING REFERENCE NOS. TD/202425/SE0077, TD/2024-25/SE0078 AND TD/2024-25/SE0081 DATED 19.02.2025 AND TD/2025-26/SE0101 AND TD/202526/SE0102 DATED 25.07.2025 (ANNEXURE-B1, B2 AND B5 AND ANNEXURE-H1 AND H2) ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH/ CANCEL THE SAME IN ITS ENTIRETY ETC.,

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶26

"a) Issue a writ, order or direction setting aside the Tender Notifications bearing Reference Nos . TD/2024-25/SE0077, TD/2024-25/SE0078 AND TD/2024-25/SE0081 dated 19.02.2025 and TD/2025-26/SE0101 AND TD/2025-26/SE0102 dated 25.07.2025 (Annexure-B1, B2 AND B5 AND Annexure-H1 AND H2) issued by respondents and consequently quash/cancel the same in its entirety;

¶27

b) Pass such other order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:47111 WP No. 26788 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo,

¶32

seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ

¶33

petition. The said memo reads as follows:

¶34

"The undersigned counsel craves the leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the captioned matter with the liberty to challenge the new tender in case of dispute (if any). The present memo be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity."

¶35

Placing the memo on record, the writ petition is

¶36

dismissed as withdrawn .

¶37

Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶38

BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58

M/S Rosmerta Technologies Limited v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Rosmerta Technologies Limited v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sarojamma Vs Aircel Ltd.

M/S. Sorting Hat Solutions Private Limited Vs Mr. Ravinder Kumar Chauhan

M/S Gannon Dunkerley and Co., Ltd. Vs M/S Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.

Sri. Venu. D. S. Vs the State of Karnataka

A Hanumantha Char Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Kirana. G Vs the State of Karnataka