S N Thippeswamy v. the Director Agricultural Marketing
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC, W.P. 26224/2022 (APMC-PIL), oral order dt. 11-03-2025 (per Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria; with Justice M.I. Arun). Petitioners (10 individuals of Davanagere, counsel L.M. Chidanandayya) challenge lease-cum-sale agreements (Annexure-A to A-9) dt. 08-11-2022 executed by Resp. 2 & 3 (Deputy Commissioner/Administrator and APMC Davanagere by its Secretary) in favour of Resp. 4-13 as illegal under the Karnataka APMC (Regulation of Allotment of Property in Market Yards) Rules, 2004 and for non-existent sites; filed under Articles 226 & 227, Constitution of India. Interim order only: 3 weeks to remove office objections else automatic dismissal; listing on 15.04.2025 on compliance. No adjudication on merits; no cases cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; purely interim procedural order: three weeks granted to remove office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed automatically without reference to the Court; upon compliance the matter is to be listed on 15.04.2025.