Dismissed¶24

M/S J P Enterprises v. the Authorized Officer

Karnataka HC14 Oct 2025WP/26204/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Judge E.S. Indiresh; WP No. 26204 of 2022 (GM-RES); M/s J.P. Enterprises, M/s Jinesh Associates and Jinesh D. v. Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Arm Branch-II; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking direction to bank to consider representation dated 17-06-2022 (Annexure-A); petition listed seventh time; counsel absent; office objections not complied with despite sufficient time; no genuine intent to diligently pursue; writ petition dismissed for non-compliance of office objections; decision dated 14-10-2025.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. ¶24

M/S J P Enterprises Vs the Authorized Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:40695 WP No. 26204 of 2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO.26204 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S J.P. ENTERPRISES NO.14/5, I FLOOR, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GANESHA BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. REP. BY MR. JINESH D.

¶10

M/S. JINESH ASSOCIATES REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. JINESH D. NO.14/5, I FLOOR, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GANESHA BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096.

¶11

Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

MR. JINESH D. S/O LATE DHARANENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.14/5, I FLOOR, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GANESHA BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK, ARM BRANCH-II, IFSC - CNRB0001985, 2^ND FLOOR, CIRCLE OFFICE, SPENCER TOWERS, NO.86, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:40695 WP No. 26204 of 2022

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, RAYING TO DIRECT TO THE RESPONDENT-BANK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 17^TH JUNE, 2022 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

There is no representation for petitioners.

¶22

This petition is of the year-2022 and listed for seventh time for non-compliance of office objections.

¶23

Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for petitioners failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioners would indicate that the petitioners have no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter.

¶24

4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for

¶25

non-compliance of office objections.

¶26

SD/(E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶27

ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

M/S J P Enterprises v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S J P Enterprises v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eidgah Vs Karnataka State Board of Wakf

Smt. Vijayakumari M Vs the Bangalore City Co. Op Bank Limited

S J Sudheer Vs the State of Karnataka

D N Thyagaraja Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Raghu Infra Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Hindustan Steel Construction Ltd.

Sri.H.C Anand Vs Police Inspector