Dismissed¶¶25

Vinod Kumar M N v. Union of India

Karnataka HC10 Mar 2025WP/257/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; WP No. 257 of 2022 (GM-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:10801; Vinod Kumar M N. (party-in-person) v. Union of India, Government of Karnataka, Karnataka State Pharmacy Council, Commissioner Mysore City Corporation; COVID-19 second dose vaccine; Article 21 of the Constitution; Articles 226 and 227; COVID-19 vaccination certificate Annexure A-01 dated 01.12.2021; petition dismissed as unnecessary/infructuous; Hon'ble Mr Justice M. Nagaprasanna; decided 10 March 2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the petition was dismissed as having become unnecessary. ¶¶25

Vinod Kumar M N Vs Union of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:10801 WP No. 257 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 257 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

VINOD KUMAR M N., S/O. C. NAGARAJU ALIAS H.C.N. WODEYAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.16, SURVEY NO. 190/2, 3^RD CROSS, TUNGA ROAD, RAGHAVENDRA NAGARA, MYSORE- 570 011.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR M.N., PARTY-IN-PERSON)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTYR OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, CABINET SECRETARIAT, RAISINA HILL, NEW DELHI- 110 001.

¶14

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE -560 001.

¶15

KARNATAKA STATE PHARMACY COUNCIL 514/E, 1^ST MAIN, 1^ST CROSS ROAD, 2^ND STAGE, VIJAYANGAR BANGALORE -560 104.

¶16

COMMISSIONER MYSORE CITY CORPORATION NEW SAYYAJI RAO ROAD, MYSORE -570 024.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:10801 WP No. 257 of 2022

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. B PRAMOD, CGC FOR R-1, SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R2)

¶21

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY PARTY-IN-PERSON AND PRAYING THAT THE PETITIONER/PARTY-IN-PERSON IS A CITIZEN OF INDIA IS ENTITLED TO SECOND DOSE OF VACCINE AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONA VIRUS) AS OTHER CITIZENS OF INDIA, GUARANTEED UNDER ARTICLE 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THEREFORE BEG THIS HONBLE HIGH COURT TO QUASH THE INFORMATION SPECIFICALLY WITH REGARD TO SECOND DOSE DTD 01.12.2021 STATED IN THE CERTIFICATE FOR COVID-19 VACCINATION VIDE ANNX-A-01 AND FURTHER DIRECT THE R-2 OR OTHER HOSPITAL AT MYSORE AUTHORIZED BY THE R-2 TO ADMINISTER/GIVE SECOND DOSE OF VACCINATION FOR COVID-19 TO THE PETITIONER/PARTY-IN-PERSON.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction for second dose COVID vaccine, but COVID-19 has subsided and vaccine has become unnecessary.

¶25

Therefore, the Petition is dismissed as having become unnecessary.

¶26

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶27

¶28