Mr. Mahesh G v. Hdfc Bank Limited

Karnataka HC10 Jul 2025WP/25684/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal permitted on petitioner's memo (petition not pressed). Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 25684 of 2023 (GM-RES); decided 10-07-2025 by Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav. Petitioner: Mahesh G (counsel Satish T.E). Respondents: HDFC Bank Limited (counsel Francis Xavier), S.V. Bharath, Sahana S.B. Subject matter (unadjudicated): direction to HDFC Bank to accept EMI payments directly from petitioner, relying on order dated 15/07/2022 in MFA 4249/2022; petition filed under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India. No quantum, no precedent engagement, no substantive ruling.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn. No relief on the merits was granted. ¶32-33

Mr. Mahesh G Vs Hdfc Bank Limited — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:25516 WP No. 25684 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 25684 OF 2023 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MR. MAHESH G, S/O MR. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GOVIANU GRACE GARDEN, BENSON ROAD, BENSON TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 046.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SATISH T.E, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

HDFC BANK LIMITED, HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT HDFC HOUSE NO.51, KASTURBA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY/ MANAGER.

¶15

MR. S.V. BHARATH S/O MR. VISHWANATH PROPRIETOR OF SMART VISIONS AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.1282/2/1, 1ST CROSS, 1^ST MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:25516 WP No. 25684 of 2023

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

MRS. SAHANA S.B, W/O MR. S.V. BHARATH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.3/2/5, 1ST CROSS, MICR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 040, BYANNA INDUSTRIAL ESTATES, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. DIRECT THE R1 TO ACCEPT PAYMENT OF EMIS DIRECTLY FROM THE PETITIONER IN VIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 15/07/2022 OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN MFA 4249/2022 AT ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.,

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as hereunder:

¶27

"The Advocate for the Petitioner herein submits that the Petitioner is desirous to withdraw the above WRIT PETITION filed by the Petitioner and the petitioner is not pressed by writ petition. Hence I request this Hon'ble Court to kindly permit the

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:25516 WP No. 25684 of 2023

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

Petitioner to withdraw the writ Petition filed by the Petitioner in the interest of justice and equity."

¶32

In light of the same, petition is dismissed as

¶33

withdrawn.

¶34