Dismissed¶50

Smt Mangalamma v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Jan 2025WP/2542/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Want of confidence motion; Grama Panchayat member; Halaguru Grama Panchayath; Malavalli Taluk; Mandya District; Annexure-B notice of intention dated 14.01.2020; Annexure-C notice of meeting dated 21.01.2020; meeting fixed 10.02.2020 at 12.00 p.m.; Assistant Commissioner Mandya Sub Division; quashing of notice; Articles 226 & 227 Constitution of India; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; prayers rendered infructuous; Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; Justice N S Sanjay Gowda; NC: 2025:KHC:520; WP No. 2542 of 2020 (LB-ELE); Respondent Nos. 3 to 21 served and unrepresented; State of Karnataka Department of Rural Development and Panchayath Raj.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous. ¶50

Smt Mangalamma Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:520 WP No. 2542 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2542 OF 2020 (LB-ELE)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT MANGALAMMA

¶8

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O SRI SHIVANNA RESIDENT OF HALAGUR VILLAGE, HALAGUR POST - 571 421 HALAGUR HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI GIRIDHAR H, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶13

DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATHRAJ VIKASA SOUDHA

¶14

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶16

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB DIVISION, MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶17

SRI SHIVAMADHU S/O SRI LATE MANCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶18

SRI BORAIAH S/O SRI KUNDURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:520 WP No. 2542 of 2020

¶20

SRI H M SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MAHADEVAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶21

SRI H R KRISHNA S/O LATE H T RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

¶22

SRI M SHRIKANTASWAMI S/O SRI K P MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶23

SMT. LAKSHAMMA H K W/O SRI THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.

¶24

SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O SRI SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶25

SMT. MANGALA W/O SRI SIDDAPAJJI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶26

SRI LAYAKATH ALI A K A PILLU S/O SRI MOHAMMED SHAFIRULLA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶27

SRI SAHANAS BEGUM HUSBAND NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶28

SRI K KRISHNEGOWDA S/O SRI KULLASIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶29

SMT. A B LAKSHMI W/O SRI C NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶30

SMT. RUKSANA BEGUM

¶31

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:520 WP No. 2542 of 2020

¶32

W/O SRI ILIYAS PASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

¶33

SRI B N NAVEEN S/O SRI NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

¶34

SMT. NETHRANGAMANI W/O SRI K C MAHESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.

¶35

SMT. JAYAMADHAMMA H C W/O SRI KEMPEGOWDA H C AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶36

SRI K S GANGADHARGOWDA S/O SRI SHIVALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

¶37

SMT. MALAMMA W/O SRI MARIKANDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶38

SMT. MUNILAKSHMI W/O SRI RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.

¶39

REPONDENT NOS. 3 TO 21 ARE MEMBERS HALAGURU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶40

…RESPONDENTS

¶41

(BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2; R-3 TO R-21 SD & UNREPRESENTED)

¶42

THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ANNEXURE-C NOTICE OF MEETING DATED 21.01.2020 ISSUED BY THE R-2 TO BE HELD ON 10.02.2020 AT 12.00 P.M PASSING OF RESOLUTION EXPRESSING WANT OF CONFIDENCE IN THE PETITION AS PER ANNEXURE-B NOTICE OF INTENTION DATED 14.01.2020 DELIVERED TO THE R-2 BY THE R-3 TO 21 OF

¶43

¶44

NC: 2025:KHC:520 WP No. 2542 of 2020

¶45

MAKING MOTION FOR PASSING OF RESOLUTION EXPRESSING WANT OF CONFIDENCE OF THE PETITIONER.

¶46

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶47

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶48

ORAL ORDER

¶49