Disposed¶43

K Chandru v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC23 Aug 2025WP/24223/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; WP No. 24223 of 2024 (LA-RES); K Chandru v. State of Karnataka (Public Works Department; RDPR; Asst. Executive Engineers, Hunsur and K R Nagar); land compensation; Article 226 of the Constitution; land utilized for formation of new road connecting Thammadahalli and Kothegala Villages; Hunsur Taluk, Mysore District; memo for withdrawal; petition rendered infructuous; disposed as withdrawn; not pressed; Justice M. Nagaprasanna; decided 23 August 2025; NC: 2025:KHC:33119.

What did the court decide?

No fresh relief granted by the Court; petition disposed as withdrawn, the respondents having already paid the compensation as stated in counsel's memo. ¶43

K Chandru Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:33119 WP No. 24223 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24223 OF 2024 (LA-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

K CHANDRU

¶10

S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT KOTHEGALA VILLGE HANGODU HOBLI HUNSUR TALUK

¶11

MYSORE DISTRICT 571105

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. PRITHVI RAJ B.N., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶17

REP BY ITS SECRETARY

¶18

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560001

¶19

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶20

REP BY ITS SECRETARY

¶21

RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND

¶22

PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

¶23

¶24

NC: 2025:KHC:33119 WP No. 24223 of 2024

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

BANGALORE 560001

¶27

THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, PORTS AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT HUNSUR SPECIAL DIVISON HUNSUR MYSORE DISTRICT 571105

¶28

THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATH RAJ ENGINEERNG DEPT., RDPR PLANNING SUB DIVISON K R NAGAR

¶29

MYSORE DISTRICT 571105

¶30

…RESPONDENTS

¶31

(BY SRI. M. RAJAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)

¶32

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY THE COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF HIS LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 20 GTS IN SY NO 83/3A AND SY.NO. 83/3B2 OF KOTHEGALA VILLAGE, WHICH HAS BEEN UTILIZED FOR FORMATION OF ROAD VIZ., NEW ROAD CONNECTING THAMMADAHALLI AND KOTHEGALA VILLAGES AT HUNSUR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT.

¶33

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶34

¶35

NC: 2025:KHC:33119 WP No. 24223 of 2024

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶38

ORAL ORDER

¶39

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo

¶40

seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

¶41

"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶42

The undersigned counsel for Petitioner submits that the Respondents have paid the compensation to the Petitioner. Hence, the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the above Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity."

¶43

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶44

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶45

SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5

K Chandru v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K Chandru v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swarna Meridians Apartments Owner'S Association Vs Sri L Krishna Moorthy

Sri Doddaiah Vs Sri Thimmaiah

Dinesh @ Krishnegowda Vs Smt.Mamta

Smt. R. Indrani Vs the Additional Director General of Revenue Intelligence

Mohammed Yousuff Vs State of Karnataka

Shri Maruti Vs State of Karnataka