Smt. Sombamma, v. Sri. M.V. Murali
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru) — WP No. 23538 of 2024 (GM-CPC), oral order dated 15-09-2025 by Justice M. Nagaprasanna. Article 227 petition directed against a temporary-injunction order dated 08.07.2024 in I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.94/2020 (III Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Anekal) held to be misconceived remedy: appeal lies under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the CPC, 1908; petition disposed with liberty reserved; no interim stay granted. Search terms: Article 227; Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC; temporary injunction; maintainability of Article 227 petition; GM-CPC; Survey No.28 Kudulu Village; O.S.No.94/2020.
What did the court decide?
None on the merits; the petition was disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy (an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC). The request to set aside the injunction order, the declaration regarding Survey No.28 and the interim stay were not adjudicated.