Dismissed¶43

Dr C Vinod Hayagriv v. Sri C Ganesh Narayan

Karnataka HC8 Oct 2025WP/22338/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; prayer sought mandamus to NCLT Bengaluru Bench to restore and decide afresh Contempt Petition No.1 of 2022 and CA No. 21 of 2023 and to set aside impugned order dated 20.06.2025 (Annexure-A); filed under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; liberty to revive reserved; bench D K Singh and Rajesh Rai K, JJ.; petitioners Hayagriv/Cotha family; respondents Narayan family, C. Ganesh Narayan HUF and C. Krishniah Chetty & Co. Pvt. Ltd.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to revive the Writ Petition, if such an occasion arises. ¶43

Dr C Vinod Hayagriv Vs Sri C Ganesh Narayan — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:39736-DB WP No. 22338 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 22338 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

DR C VINOD HAYAGRIV SON OF MR. C. V. HAYAGRIV, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS

¶13

MR. C.V. HAYAGRIV SON OF LATE C. VENKATACHALAPATHY CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS

¶14

Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

MRS. C. TRIVENI VINOD WIFE OF MR. VINOD HAYAGRIV, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

¶16

MRS. C. VISALA HAYAGRIV WIFE OF MR. C. V. HAYAGRIV, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS

¶17

MR. CHAITANYA V. COTHA SON OF MR. VINOD HAYAGRIV, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶18

MR. SHREYAS V. COTHA SON OF MR. VINOD HAYAGRIV, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶19

PETITIONER NOS. 2 TO 6 REPRESENTED BY THEIR

¶20

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:39736-DB WP No. 22338 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, DR. C. VINOD HAYAGRIV, SON OF MR. C.V.HAYAGRIV, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.

¶23

PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 6 ALL RESIDING AT "KRISHNA PRASAD", 1/34, ULSOOR ROAD, W. H. HANUMANTHAPPA LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 56004.

¶24

…PETITIONERS

¶25

(BY SRI. MANDEEP KALRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HITESH GOWDA B.J, ADVOCATE)

¶26

AND:

¶27

SRI C GANESH NARAYAN SON OF LATE MR. C.V. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶28

SMT. C. VALLI NARAYAN WIFE OF LATE MR. C.V. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS

¶29

C. GANESH NARAYAN HUF THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RESPONDENT NOS. 1-23 RESIDING AT NO. 44, OSBORNE ROAD, ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 042.

¶30

DEEPALI CO. PVT. LTD. [COMPANY REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT] (NOW KNOWN AS C. KRISHNIAH CHETTY & CO. PVT. LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.35 COMMERCIAL STREET, BENGALURU - 560 001 THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

¶31

…RESPONDENTS

¶32

(BY SMT. SAMEEKSHA PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. KRUTIKA RAGHAVAN, ADVOATE FOR C/R1-R4)

¶33

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:39736-DB WP No. 22338 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE HON'BLE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH, TO RESTORE AND DECIDE AFRESH THE CONTEMPT PETITION No.1 OF 2022 AND CA NO. 21 OF 2023, WITHIN A PERIOD OF FOUR WEEKS FROM THE ORDER OF THIS HONORABLE COURT AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20.06.2025 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

¶36

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶37

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶38

ORAL ORDER

¶39

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

¶40

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners

¶41

submits that he would like to withdraw this Writ Petition.