Dismissed¶33

Sundaresha C a v. Secretary

Karnataka HC19 Nov 2025WP/21963/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal memo; Karnataka High Court Bengaluru; Justice R. Nataraj; WP No. 21963 of 2019 (LB-RES); writ petition Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; mobile telecommunication tower; illegal tower; Indus Towers Pvt. Ltd.; Klassik Landmark Apartment; Halanayakanahalli; Junanasandara; Sarjapura Road; Bannerghatta Road; panchayat raj; PDO; pending I.As. dismissed; no merits decided; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the memo filed by the petitioners' counsel, and pending I.As. were dismissed as not surviving. ¶33

Sundaresha C a Vs Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:47774 WP No. 21963 of 2019

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 21963 OF 2019 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SUNDARESHA C.A. S/O ANANTHARAMAN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS KLASSIK LANDMARK SY NO.34/10 FLAT NO.4C, BLUE BELL TOWERS JUNANSANDARA OFF SARJAPURA ROAD NEXT TO AMRITA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-35

¶9

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

RUCHIN JOSHI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O SHIVDATT JOSHI KLASSIK LANDMARK SY NO.34/10 FLAT NO.7E, ASTER TOWERS JUNANSANDARA OFF SARJAPURA ROAD NEXT TO AMRITA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-35

¶11

KLASSIK LANDMARK APARTMENT SY NO.10/1 AND 11/1 KALENA AGRAHARA NEAR MEENAKSHI TEMPLE BANNERUGHATTA ROAD BY ITS MANAGER C.A.SUNDARESHA

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY MS. YUKTHA N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MITHUN GERAHALLI A., ADVOCATE)

¶14

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:47774 WP No. 21963 of 2019

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

AND:

¶17

SECRETARY PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

¶18

PACHAYATH RAJ DEVELOPMENT OFFICE PANCHAYATH PDO HALANAYAKANAHALLI JUNANASANDARA BANGALORE-560029

¶19

INDUS TOWERS PVT. LTD. 12, TOWER D, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE 7^TH FLOOR, BANNERGHATTA BANGALORE-560029 BY ITS MANAGER

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;

¶22

SRI. K.V. LAKSHMANACHAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2; SRI. GURURAJ D.M., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO STOP THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FROM ERECTING THE ILLEGAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER OPPOSITE TO KLASSIK LANDMARK APARTMENT BUILDING SITUATED IN HALAMANAYAKANAHALLI, OFF SARJAPURA ROAD, WITHIN 9 METERS RADIUS AND FURTHER WITHOUT A PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ETC.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶26

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:47774 WP No. 21963 of 2019

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition.

¶31

The memo is taken on record.

¶32

In view of the memo, this writ petition is

¶33

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

In view of dismissal of the writ petition, all pending

¶35

I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and the same

¶36

stand dismissed.

¶37

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶38

PMR

¶39

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59

Sundaresha C a v. Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundaresha C a v. Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B T Bhagyamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr. Balakrishna B L., Vs the Panchayath Development Officer

Surendra K Alias Sachin Vs the State of Karnataka

Halu Utpadakara Mahila Sahakari Sanga Niyamitha Vs the State of Karnataka

Habitat Splendour Owners Association Vs Greater Bengaluru Authority

Tobby Simon Vs the State of Karnataka