Dismissed¶34

Mr. P Riyaz v. M/S Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.

Karnataka HC4 Dec 2025WP/20883/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; NC: 2025:KHC:51159; WP No. 20883 of 2025 (GM-RES); Justice Suraj Govindaraj; decided 04.12.2025; Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.; SARFAESI Act Section 14; possession notice Annexure-D dated 11/6/2025; certiorari; mandamus; dispossession; DRT-II challenge; memo dated 04.12.2025; petition dismissed as withdrawn; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; borrower and co-borrower petitioners; Vijayapura, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural; no merits decided; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition accepted; petition dismissed as withdrawn (no relief granted on the possession notice). ¶34

Mr. P Riyaz Vs M/S Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd. — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:51159 WP No. 20883 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 20883 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MR. P RIYAZ S/O LATE S.K. PYARE JAAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RAT NO. 4540, WARD NO-23, RAHAMATHNAGAR, VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 135 KARNATAKA.

¶10

MRS. NOOR ASFIYA, W/O P.RIYAZ, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT NO.4540, WARD NO-23, RAHAMATHNAGAR, VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 135. (PETITIONER NO.1 - BORROWER AND PETITIONER NO.2 CO-BORROWER)

¶11

Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY SRI. MUSRATH TABASSUM, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

M/S. JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD., AT THE FAIRWAY BUSINESS PARK, 1ST FLOOR, DOMALUR,

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:51159 WP No. 20883 of 2025

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

KORAMANGALA INNER RING ROAD, NEAR EMBASSY GOLF LINKS BUSINESS PARK CHALLAGHATTA, BANGALORE - 560 071 REP. BY GENERAL MANAGER REGISTERED UNDER BANKING COMPANY ACT 1949.

¶19

MR.P.BABAJAN, S/O LATE, S.K. PYARE JAAN, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/AT WARD NO-23, RAHAMATHNAGAR. VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK. BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562135

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. SURESH V, ADVOCATE FOR R1)

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASHING THE POSSESSION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE D DATED 11/6/2025 AND ETC.,

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶26

a) Issue writ of certiorari/ or writ of like nature for quashing the POSSESSION NOTICE issued by the respondent bank Vide Annexure-D dated 11/6/2025.

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:51159 WP No. 20883 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

b) Issuing a writ of Mandamus like direction of like not to dispossess the petitioners from the schedule property by the respondent Bank, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶30

B) Such further and other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may consider fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice, equity and law

¶31

A memo dated 04.12.2025 has been filed by the counsel

¶32

for the petitioners, which reads as under:

¶33

" The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit withdrawal of the above petition as the petitioner has challenged order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act before the Hon'ble DRT - II. Hence this memo, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶34

Accepting the said memo, the petition is dismissed as

¶35

withdrawn .

¶36

Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶37

ykl List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Mr. P Riyaz v. M/S Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. P Riyaz v. M/S Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Mahalakshmi (Samskruthika Kala Halli Sambrama) Devasthanda Seva Samithi Trust (R) Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S. Maha Mysore Boat Building Enterprises Vs State of Karnataka

Deavaraju M Vs the State of Karnataka

Nandan Sunder Rajan Vs State Information Commissioner

Sri. Rangaswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Lakshmamma Vs the State of Karnataka