Dismissed¶23

Mr.C.Jayagopal v. Sree Charan Souhardha Sahakara Bank Niyamitha

Karnataka HC10 Jan 2025WP/2078/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 2078 of 2021 (GM-RES); Justice Jyoti Mulimani; order dated 10 January 2025; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; petitioner C. Jayagopal absent and unrepresented on 07.01.2025 and 10.01.2025; observation that advocate must be present when case is listed and called out; respondent Sree Charan Souhardha Sahakara Bank Niyamitha; no merits adjudicated; no precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, the petitioner having failed to appear or be represented when the case was called. ¶23

Mr.C.Jayagopal Vs Sree Charan Souhardha Sahakara… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:1026 WP No. 2078 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 2078 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. C.JAYAGOPAL S/O C.CHENNA RAYUDU, AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT VILLA NO.98, CONFIDENT BILLATRIX, SARJAPURA ROAD, BILLAPURA, SARJAPURA, BANGALORE-562 125.

¶9

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶10

THE RESPONDENT MENTIONED AS R/AT FLAT NO.023, BLOCK-F, SAIPOORNA HEIGHTS, OPPOSITE FAMILIES SUPER MARKET, SOMASUNDARAPALYA, HSR 2^ND SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 012. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

¶11

AND:

¶12

SREE CHARAN SOUHARDHA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE, AT NO.87/1, H.B.SAMAJA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 004. REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED OFFICER.

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI. P.ANAND., ADVOCATE)

¶15

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC:1026 WP No. 2078 of 2021

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented.

¶21

When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

¶22

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 10.01.2025.

¶23

The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶24

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶25

MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Mr.C.Jayagopal v. Sree Charan Souhardha Sahakara Bank Niyamitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.C.Jayagopal v. Sree Charan Souhardha Sahakara Bank Niyamitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashanth P N Vs State of Karnataka

The Manager Vs Sri Seshagirinatha Reddy Manyam

Mr Ashok Kumar Vs the Government Ofindia

Sri. N Nagaraj Vs Smt. Jayalakshmi

Karnataka Slum Development Board Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Ashok C Nilugal Vs State of Karnataka