Basavaraj and Anr. v. Deputy Commissioner and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged an order dated in which the Assistant Commissioner, exercising powers under Section 44 of the Act, directed them to vacate premises, affirmed in revision by the Deputy Commissioner. The High Court heard counsel on both sides.
What the court decided
- 1 -
������������������� ���������������������
��������
������������������������������� ��
��!�"������"�����
#���#����$��������� �#�%������&�'"�� ������
"������
�������("!��'���)�$�����'���$���'�!�
���������������������������������*�'���$+
"��������
- ��� ������������������������������������
- ��������������������������������
- ����������������������������������������� ��������������������!��"���
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Assistant Commissioner's order under Section 44 of the Act directing vacation of premises and the Deputy Commissioner's confirmation were sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners
- respondent
Respondents 1 to 5
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/201328/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court