Dismissed
Smt K Kala v. the Registrar General
Karnataka HCWP/201/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2025:KHC:4870 WP No. 201 of 2023 IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
2025:KHC:4870 WP No. 201 of 2023 IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2025:KHC:4870 WP No. 201 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 201 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. K KALA W/O VELU AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.125/B 2ND MAIN ROAD BAPUJINAGARA BANGALORE-560026.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SATISH K., ADV.)
AND:
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA OPPOSITE TO VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA G GAYATRI, ADV. FOR R1) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENT AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PAY AND SETTLE THE LEAVE ENCASHMENT, GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND, GROUP INSURANCE AND DEATH CUM RETIREMENT GRATUITY (DCRG) OF LATE K. GOPALA, IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH 8 PERCENT
NC: 2025:KHC:4870 WP No. 201 of 2023
INTEREST FROM THE DUE DATE FOR DELAYED PAYMENT TILL DATE OF ACTUAL REALIZATION AND INCLUDE THE COSTS OF THIS WRIT PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo dated
03.02.2025 seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition,
with liberty to agitate the grounds urged herein in the P &
SC No.25002/2023 pending on the file of the IV Additional
City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore.
arising out of KCSRs is foreclosed and the petitioner cannot urge before the P & SC Court. If the claim relates to any other benefit or property, the petitioner is at liberty to claim.
prayer for liberty would submit that the petitioner is Class-II heir and she would be entitled for DCRG.
the definition of “Family” under Rule 302 of KCSRs, daughter, who is Class-I heir would be entitled for DCRG. If there are no Class-I heirs, then Class-II heirs would be entitled. Admittedly the petitioner is class-II heir.
In view of dismissal of the writ petition, I.A.No.1/2024 for impleading is rejected.
Sd/(S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
SMT. K KALA
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court