Disposed¶34

M/S Pradeep Surgical Dressings Pvt. Ltd. v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC6 Feb 2025WP/201/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 201 of 2020 (GM-RES); decided 06.02.2025 by Justice Jyoti Mulimani; mandamus; consideration of representation dated 20.08.2019 vide Annexure-M; Additional Director, Karnataka State Drugs Logistics and Warehousing Society; Commissioner, Health and Family Welfare; compliance within ten weeks; no opinion expressed on merits; writ petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2019 (Annexure-M) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within ten weeks. ¶34

M/S Pradeep Surgical Dressings Pvt. Ltd. Vs the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:5460 WP No. 201 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 201 OF 2020 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S. PRADEEP SURGICAL DRESSINGS PVT LTD., NO.S-404, HM TAMBOURINE, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, JARAGANAHALLI, J. P. NAGAR, 6^TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. REP BY SRI. PRADEEP RAO, MANAGING DIRECTOR.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. PRATHAP.S.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MONESH KUMAR.K.B., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R

¶13

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 002.

¶15

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE DRUGS LOGISTICS AND WAREHOUSING SOCIETY, NO.1, DR. SIDDAIAH PURANIK ROAD, KHB COLONY, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 079.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SMT. SUMANA BALIGA., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:5460 WP No. 201 of 2020

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

Sri.Prathap.S.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.Monesh

¶24

Kumar.K.B., for the petitioner, Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 and Smt.Sumana Baliga.M., counsel for respondent No.2 have appeared in person.

¶25

The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.08.2019 vide Annexure-M.

¶26

Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers

¶27

with care.

¶28

Counsel for the petitioner submits that a Mandamus may be ordered directing the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.08.2019.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:5460 WP No. 201 of 2020

¶31

Counsel for the second respondent submits that an appropriate order may be passed.

¶32

The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record.

¶33

A Mandamus is ordered directing the second respondent to consider representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.08.2019 vide Annexure-M and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law within ten weeks.

¶34

6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of .

¶35

This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶36

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶37

MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 34

M/S Pradeep Surgical Dressings Pvt. Ltd. v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Pradeep Surgical Dressings Pvt. Ltd. v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. C Shivamurthy Vs State Bank of India

Mr. Anil Kumar Tumu @ T Anil Kumar Vs Mr.Ghanshyam Das Mundra

Anand Rathi Global Finance Limited Vs the District Registrar

Smt Rathnamma C Vs Sri S Hanumanthegowda

Sri. B.M Aekoramaswamy Vs Union of India

Mohan Chandra Karvi Vs the State of Karnataka