Smt. Shilpa T R v. the Chif Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court disposes of writ petition against Bank of Baroda possession notice (Annexure-F, dated 16-05-2025, Arasikere Branch); certiorari under Articles 226/227 declined in favour of alternative remedy doctrine; petitioner relegated to Section 17 SARFAESI Act remedy before DRT; Union Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon (2010) 8 SCC 110 relied on; four-week restraint on precipitative steps; OTS and account regularisation pleas left open; limitation credit for time spent before High Court; bench: S Sunil Dutt Yadav.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of; petitioner relegated to the substantive remedy (Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act / DRT) as regards the impugned proceedings; respondent-Bank directed not to take precipitative steps for four weeks; all contentions of both sides kept open; time spent before the High Court to be reckoned for limitation before the DRT.