Smt Muniyamma v. Sri Muniyappa
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC Bengaluru, 09-12-2025, Pradeep Singh Yerur J.; WP No. 18825 of 2024 (GM-CPC); writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India seeking direction to respondents to consider petitioners' representation; dismissed for non-prosecution after failure to rectify office objections within time granted by order dated 09.10.2025 and absence of counsel/petitioners on call-out; petitioners Muniyamma, Rajappa, Pillamma, Rajamma (through SPA holder Sri Srinivas; advocate Muralidharan D.) vs respondents Muniyappa, Krishnappa, Radhamma, Muniyamma, Mangamma, N. Devarajaiah; no ratio on merits, no cases cited, no quantum; usable only as an example of dismissal for non-prosecution practice.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution: office objections were not rectified within the week granted by order dated 09.10.2025, and there was no representation for the petitioners when the matter was called out, leading the Court to conclude that the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the petition.