Sri Muni Anjinappa v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC16 Jan 2025WP/18644/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Khata cancellation; Form No.9 and Form No.11; Grama Panchayat records; Executive Officer, Bangalore North Taluk Panchayat, Yelahanka; Bagaluru village, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk; parity with W.P. No.55905 of 2014 (allowed 28.06.2021); restoration of Khatedar name; Article 226 writ petition (LB-RES); order dated 10.06.2014 quashed; Karnataka High Court; NC: 2025:KHC:1802.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 10.06.2014 quashed insofar as the petitioner is concerned; restoration of the petitioner's name as Khatedar if it was deleted pursuant to the impugned order. ¶¶29

Sri Muni Anjinappa Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1802 WP No. 18644 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 18644 OF 2021 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI MUNI ANJINAPPA SON OF PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO. 504/2, MAHESHWARAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, BAGALURU COLONY, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN 562149

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY Ms. CHANDANA.G., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HIS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PANCHYATH RAJ VIDHANA SOUDHHA, BENGALURU 560 001.

¶14

THE SECRETARY BENGALURU GRAMA PANCHAYATH JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENALURU 526 149.

¶15

THE SECRETARY BENGALURUGRAMA PANCHAYATH JALA HOBLI,BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU 526 149

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA., AGA FOR R-1; SRI.B.J.SOMAYAJI., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3)

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:1802 WP No. 18644 of 2021

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10.06.2014 PASSED BY THE R2 I.E., EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA ANNEXURE-A CANCELLING THE KHATA AND FORM NO.9 AND 11 AS ILLEGAL AND CONSEQUENTLY ALSO QUASH ALL THE ILLEGAL DOCUMENTS ENTRIES IN THE PANCHAYAT OFFICE, BAGALURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLIL, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM : HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

It is not in dispute that the order impugned in this writ petition was the subject matter of writ petition No.55905 of 2014 which was filed by nine petitioners who were also affected by the said order.

¶25

It is also not in dispute that the aforementioned writ petition was allowed on 28.06.2021 and the order impugned therein i.e., order dated 10.06.2014, insofar as the petitioners therein were concerned, was quashed by this Court.

¶26

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1802 WP No. 18644 of 2021

¶27

In light of the order passed in W.P. No.55905 of 2014, the impugned order insofar as the petitioners herein are concerned, are also required to be quashed and are accordingly quashed .

¶28

If the name of the petitioner has been deleted as the Khatedar pursuant to the impugned order, the same shall be restored.

¶29

The writ petition is allowed accordingly.

¶30

Sd/(N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

¶31

RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57

Sri Muni Anjinappa v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Muni Anjinappa v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjana Dassani, Vs the Commissioner

Vhbcs Layout Residents Welfare Association Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Kaveerappa @ Munukaverappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Yogesh B S Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. N. Rajanna Vs the State of Karnataka

B M S Educational Trust Vs State of Karnataka