Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

H K Renukaprasad Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
H K Renukaprasad Vs State of KarnatakaH K Renukaprasad v. State of Karnataka

Dismissed¶47

H K Renukaprasad v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC4 Sept 2025WP/18580/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

No merits ratio; disposed by withdrawal. NC: 2025:KHC:34858; W.P. No.18580/2024 (CS-RES), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, R. Nataraj J., 04.09.2025. Petitioners H.K. Renukaprasad, Siddaramaiah, Mahalingiah, Parameshwraiah, Shilaja, Veeregowda, Nagaraju .S, Ravikumar, Sanaulla, Lingaprasad H.B., Kempaiah and Shivamurthy H.L. (counsel: Devi Prasad Shetty) versus State of Karnataka Department of Co-operation, Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies Tumkuru Sub-Division (counsel: Harisha A.S., AGA, for R1 & R2) and Halanuru Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Ltd. Challenge under Articles 226 and 227 to notices dated 29/05/2024 in No. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 (Annexures C-C11); dismissed as withdrawn on petitioners' memo dated 04.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication.

Why is it important?

The memo dated 04.09.2025 filed by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition was taken on record, and in view of the memo the petition was dismissed as withdrawn; no substantive adjudication of the challenge to the notices was made. ¶47

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication.

Issue for consideration

Whether the notices dated 29/05/2024 in No. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 issued by Respondent No. 2 (Annexures C to C11) ought to be quashed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Ratio / Principle

The memo dated 04.09.2025 filed by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition was taken on record, and in view of the memo the petition was dismissed as withdrawn; no substantive adjudication of the challenge to the notices was made.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 18580/2024 (CS-RES), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (R. Nataraj J.), order dated 04.09.2025: Twelve residents of Halanur, Kasaba Hobli, Tumkur, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash notices dated 29/05/2024 in No. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 issued by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tumkuru Sub-Division (Respondent No. 2), produced at Annexures C to C11. When the petition came on for orders, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo dated 04.09.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition; the memo was taken on record and, in view of the memo, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive ruling was made on the validity of the impugned notices.

A

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:34858 W.P. No.18580/2024

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.18580/2024 (CS-RES)

BETWEEN:

H.K. RENUKAPRASAD S/O H. KEMPEBOREGOWDA AGED 54 YEARS R/O. HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

SIDDARAMAIAH S/O SIDDANANAJAPPA AGED 80 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

MAHALINGIAH S/O LATE BOMMALINGIAH AGED 64 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

PARAMESHWRAIAH S/O NANJUNDAPPA

AGE 61 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

SHILAJA W/O H.C. SIDDALINGESHWARA AGE 48 YEARS

R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

VEEREGOWDA S/O NAGAIAH AGED 59 YEARS R/O HALANUR, MALEGONDANAHALLI HALANUR POST, KASABA HOBLI

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:34858 W.P. No.18580/2024

HC-KAR

TUMKUR - 572107.

NAGARAJU .S S/O SIDDAIAH AGED 59 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

RAVIKUMAR S/O MAHALINGAPPA AGE 30 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

SANAULLA S/O KALANDER SAB AGE 39 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

LINGAPRASAD H.B. S/O BORANNA AGE 63 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

KEMPAIAH S/O DASAPPA AGE 63 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

SHIVAMURTHY H.L. S/O LAKSHMIAH AGED 47 YEARS S/O DASAPPA AGED 63 YEARS R/O HALANUR, HALANUR POST KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572107.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE,)

AND:

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:34858 W.P. No.18580/2024

HC-KAR

STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION M.S.BUILDING - 560001.

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TUMKURU SUB-DIVISION TUMKURU-5720101 - 572101.

HALANURU MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD HALANURU, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572107. REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.HARISHA A.S. AGA FOR R1 & R2)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR. 01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C1, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI- 32/G.B.M/CR01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C2, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C3, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2023 IN NO. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C4. THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C5, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI- 32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C6, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C7, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C8, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI32/G.B.M/CR- 01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C9, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI- 32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C10, THE NOTICE DATED 29/05/2024 IN NO. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE C11 & ETC.

4 -

NC: 2025:KHC:34858 W.P. No.18580/2024

HC-KAR

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo

dated 04.09.2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Memo is taken on record.

In view of the memo, this petition is dismissed as

withdrawn .

Sd/-

(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

BKN

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the notices dated 29/05/2024 in No. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 issued by Respondent No. 2 (Annexures C to C11) ought to be quashed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.medium confidence¶37

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Constitution of IndiaArticles 226 and 227¶37

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Notices dated 29/05/2024 in No. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 issued by Respondent No. 2, produced at Annexures C to C11, which the petitioners prayed to quash.¶37
Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tumkuru Sub-Division (Respondent No. 2) · 29/05/2024

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
H.K. RENUKAPRASAD¶8
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
SIDDARAMAIAH¶9
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
MAHALINGIAH¶10
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
PARAMESHWRAIAH¶12
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
SHILAJA¶14
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
VEEREGOWDA¶16
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
NAGARAJU .S¶20
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
RAVIKUMAR¶21
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
SANAULLA¶22
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
LINGAPRASAD H.B.¶23
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
KEMPAIAH¶24
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
petitioner
SHIVAMURTHY H.L.¶25
DEVI PRASAD SHETTY
respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION¶31
HARISHA A.S.
respondent
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TUMKURU SUB-DIVISION¶33
HARISHA A.S.
respondent
HALANURU MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD¶34

Coram

AI extract

R. NATARAJauthor¶42

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 4 Sept 2025 · September
Registered: 11 Jul 2024
Case no.: WP/18580/2024
CNR: KAHC010395692024
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: R. Natara
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: W.P. (CS-RES)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Natara

Sri Chamaraj H Patil Vs Commissioner
3 Sept 2025
Ramakrishna Gowda Vs Rangaiah
3 Sept 2025
Smt Ambuja Vs State of Karnataka
3 Sept 2025
Smt. Roopa Suresh Vs State of Karnataka
4 Sept 2025
Ballekere Milk Producers Vs the State of Karnataka
4 Sept 2025
Sri.M.Manjunath Vs Karnataka Co-Operative Election Authority
4 Sept 2025

Cite this judgement

H K Renukaprasad v. State of Karnataka, WP/18580/2024 (KA), decided on 4 September 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Constitution of IndiaArticles 226 and 227

View all statutes

Procedural history1

Notices dated 29/05/2024 in No. SANI-32/G.B.M/CR-01/2024-25 issued by Respondent No. 2, produced at Annexures C to C11, which the petitioners prayed to quash.Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tumkuru Sub-Division (Respondent No. 2) · 29/05/2024

View full history

Bench / Coram

R. NATARAJ

Parties & counsel