Sri.M.Narasimha Madhava Bhat v. Shri Venkataramamna Temple
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:40348 | HC-KAR | WP No. 16954 of 2021 (GM-CPC) | High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru | Justice S Vishwajith Shetty (sole judge, author) | decided 13-10-2025 | Petitioner: M. Narasimha Madhava Bhat (adv. Vinayaka B Vishnu Batta) vs Respondents: Shri Venkataramamna Temple, Mulky, R1(A)-R1(G) individuals and Sri Venkatesh Prabhkar Bhat (adv. Jagadish Baliga N; R2 served-unrepresented) | Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India | Sought quashing of order dtd.19.8.2021 in M.A.No.13/2021 (III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, D.K. Mangaluru) and confirmation of order dtd.18.6.2021 on IA No.II in O.S.No.54/2021 | Disposition: petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous after counsel reported disposal of O.S.No.54/2021 | Keywords: infructuous, rendered infructuous, memo taken on record, GM-CPC, M.A.No.13/2021, O.S.No.54/2021, IA No.II.
What did the court decide?
Since O.S.No.54/2021, out of which the writ petition arose, had already been disposed of by the Trial Court, the petition did not survive for consideration; the petitioner's submission and memo were taken on record and the petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.