Dismissed¶¶23
Sri Parasmal v. the Commissioner
Karnataka HCWP/16424/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:41859 | High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru | WP No. 16424 of 2024 (LB-BMP) | Justice R. Nataraj | Order dated 23-10-2025 | Parasmal v. Commissioner, BBMP & Assistant Director Town Planning (South). Petition dismissed for non-compliance of office objections; no representation for petitioner despite sufficient adjournments. No determination on Section 248(3) Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 or the dismissal of Appeal No. 120/2023 (Annexures H and J). Useful only as an instance of summary dismissal for default under Articles 226/227 petitions; not citable for any substantive proposition on BBMP Act enforcement.
What did the court decide?
There was no representation for the petitioner when the petition came on for orders. ¶¶20