Dismissed¶37

Kum Nanda Gouthami v. Sri G Thimmappa

Karnataka HC7 Jul 2025WP/1626/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), W.P. No.1626/2019 (GM-CPC), Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil, order dated 07.07.2025: minor petitioner's Article 227 challenge to Lok-Adalat compromise/decree in O.S.No.313/2014 (dt. 21.07.2017, Chitradurga) dismissed as withdrawn after counsel's memo citing subsequent compromise in O.S.No.117/2017 (dt. 12.07.2024); no merits decided, no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

None on the merits; the writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn and was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner via memo filed by counsel. ¶37

Kum Nanda Gouthami Vs Sri G Thimmappa — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:22342 W.P. No.1626/2019

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.1626/2019 (GM-CPC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka

¶8

KUM. NANDA GOUTHAMI D/O LATE VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN/HER MATERNAL GRAND MOTHER BY NAME SMT. SANNA KOTRAMMA W/O LATE CHAMARAJU AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT. BANGARAKKANAHALLY CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DIST-577501.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SIDDAPPA B.M. ADV.,)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SRI. G. THIMMAPPA S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS.

¶13

SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LR'S.

¶14

SMT. JYOTHI W/O THIMMA REDDY C/O THIMMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS BELLARY DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK HOSPET-583201, BELLARY DIST.

¶15

SRI. THIPPESWAMY S/O G. THIMMAPPA

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:22342 W.P. No.1626/2019

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT. BANGARAKKANAHALLI TURUVANUR HOBLI CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DIST-577501.

¶19

SMT. SHYLAJA W/O LATE VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT. BANGARAKKANAHALLI TURUVANUR HOBLI CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DIST-577501.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. SURESH .P & SRI. PAVAN KUMAR, ADVS., FOR R1 TO R3 V/O/DTD:24.03.2025 R2 & R3 ARE LR'S OF DECEASED R1 R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶22

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF WRIT, QUASHING THE COMPROMISE/DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.313/2014 DTD 21.07.2017, BEFORE THE LOK-ADALAT IN THE MATTER PENDING BEFORE THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, CHITRADURGA VIDE ANNX-B & ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

On earlier occasion, the learned counsel for the

¶27

petitioner has argued the matter for sometime.

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:22342 W.P. No.1626/2019

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶32

has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition which reads as under:

¶33

"In view of the compromise entered between the plaintiff and defendants in the O.S.No.117/2017 on 12/07/2024 in the said suit where the petitioner is defendant No.5 and respondents herein are the defendant No.1 to 4, the top noted writ petition become infructuous as such same may be permit to withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.

¶34

The copy of the compromise petition is enclosed herewith"

¶35