Dismissed¶51

Sri Aralappa v. Smt Jayamma

Karnataka HC27 Oct 2025WP/14754/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, WP 14754/2024 (GM-CPC), Article 227 Constitution of India, decided 27-10-2025 by Justice S Vishwajith Shetty. Petitioner Aralappa v. Jayamma & 15 others (incl. LRs of deceased Srinivasa and Kittamma). Challenge to order dt. 01/04/2024 of Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli on IA 1/2023 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC in FDP 25/2014 (Annexure-A); prayer to allow fresh Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC application (Annexure-L). Dismissed as infructuous on petitioner's memo; no merits adjudication; no cases cited; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the writ petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous on the petitioner's memo. ¶51

Sri Aralappa Vs Smt Jayamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:43138 WP No. 14754 of 2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 14754 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI ARALAPPA, S/O SHILPI KODANDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT LAKSHMI NILAYA, WARD NO.07, VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPEL GUDI BEEDI, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 110.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR N., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

SMT JAYAMMA, W/O NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS, R/AT MUTTUGADAHALLI VILLAGE, KALWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.

¶15

SRI NANJAPPA, S/O LATE THAMMANNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS,

¶16

SRI DASAPPA, S/O LATE GOPALASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,

¶17

SRI NARAYANASWAMY, S/O LATE GOPALASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

¶18

VENKATARAMANAPPA, S/O LATE GOPALASHETTY,

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:43138 WP No. 14754 of 2024

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

¶22

RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO 5 ARE

¶23

R/AT FORT, DEVANAHALLI TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

¶24

SRI SRINIVASA, (SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S)

¶25

SMT MANJULA, W/O LATE SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

¶26

SMT SHASHIKALA, W/O SATHISH, D/O LATE SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

¶27

SMT RATHNA, S/O SURESH, D/O LATE SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

¶28

SRI. VINAY, S/O LATE SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

¶29

RESPONDENT NO.6 TO 9 ARE R/AT VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, KOTE, DEVANAHALLI TOWN TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

¶30

SMT KITTAMMA, W/O VENKATAPPA , D/O LATE RANGAPPA, (SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S)

¶31

SMT NAGAMMA, W/O RAMANJINAPPA, D/O LATE KITTAMMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶32

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:43138 WP No. 14754 of 2024

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

SRI NAGARAJA, S/O LATE KITTAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶35

SRI NATASHEKARA, S/O LATE KITTAMMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶36

SMT SUSHEELA, W/O VENKATESH, D/O LATE KITTAMMA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

¶37

RESPONDENT NO.10 TO 13 ARE R/AT VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, KOTE, DEVANAHALLI TOWN TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

¶38

SMT SAROJAMMA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O SURYAPRAKASH, D/O RANGAPPA, R/AT KAMTI STREET, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.

¶39

SMT LAKSHMAMMA, W/O GURAPPA, D/O LATE GOPAL SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT THADRAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 101.

¶40

SRI SYED SULEMAN, S/O LATE SYED OSMAN, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO.46, PROMENDE ROAD, SIVANASHETTY GARDEN, BANGALORE - 560 042.

¶41

¶42

NC: 2025:KHC:43138 WP No. 14754 of 2024

¶43

HC-KAR

¶44

…RESPONDENTS

¶45

(BY SRI. GNANAMURTHY C., ADVOCATE FOR R1)

¶46

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01/04/2024 PASSED IN FDP NO. 25/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT DEVANAHALLI ON IA NO. 1/2023 FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND ETC.,

¶47

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶48

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶49

ORAL ORDER

¶50

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to dismiss the writ petition, as the same has been rendered infructuous.

¶51