Dismissed¶¶31

Hugar Shanthamma W/O Late Hugar v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC4 Mar 2025WP/146349/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default / non-prosecution of a writ petition (Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; certiorari) seeking to quash the Assistant Commissioner, Hospet order dated 14.10.2019 bearing No.KAM/BHUPA/42A/201313 (Annexure-M), Ballari district (KLR-CON classification); counsel absent, no representation; office objections Sl.Nos.18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 29, 30, 32, 35 uncomplied; petitioners deemed not interested in prosecution; M.G. Uma, J.; 04-03-2025; Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench.

What did the court decide?

Learned counsel for the petitioners was absent, with no representation. ¶¶28

Hugar Shanthamma W/O Late Hugar Vs the Deputy… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4195 WP No. 146349 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶3

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 146349 OF 2020 (KLR-CON)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

HUGAR SHANTHAMMA W/O. LATE HUGAR MALLIKARJUN, AGE:45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: RAMANAGARA, H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI.

¶9

HUGAR SHYAMALA D/O. LATE HUGAR MALLIKARJUN W/O. HUGAR SHANKAR, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: RAMANAGARA, H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI.

¶10

MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD

¶11

HUGAR MAMTHA D/O. LATE HUGAR MALLIKARJUN, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: RAMANAGARA, H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI.

¶12

HUGAR POORNIMA D/O. LATE HUGAR MALLIKARJUN, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: RAMANAGARA, H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI.

¶13

…PETITIONERS

¶14

(BY SRI. S.H.MITTALKOD AND SRI. V.S. KOUJALAGI, ADV - ABSENT)

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4195 WP No. 146349 of 2020

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI DISTRICT, BALLARI.

¶18

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HOSPET, TQ: HOSPET, DIST: BALLARI.

¶19

THE THASILDAR, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, TQ: HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, DIST: BALLARI.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA)

¶22

¶23

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 14.10.2019 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NO.KAM/BHUPA/42A/201313 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-M IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶24

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA

¶26

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4195 WP No. 146349 of 2020

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No

¶29

representation.

¶30

The petition is of the year 2020. Several objections were raised by the office, and many of them remained un-complied till date. As per the office note, the office objections at Sl.Nos.18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 29, 30, 32 and 35 are not complied with. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.

¶31

Hence, the petition is dismissed for default i.e. for

¶32

Non-prosecution .

¶33

Sd/(M.G.UMA) JUDGE

¶34

MKM

¶35

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

Hugar Shanthamma W/O Late Hugar v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hugar Shanthamma W/O Late Hugar v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Beerappa Lokappa Naik Vs the Land Tribunal

Abdul Rehaman K S/O Abdul Rawoof K Vs the Head of the Board

Sri.Satyappa B Suraani, Vs Sri.Sangappa K Suraani

Smt. Indiraje W/O Bhairava Singh Ghorpade Vs the Joint Director of Land Records

Gangadharayya S/O Mahantlingayya Hireamth Aliyas Kustagi Vs the Deputy Commisioner

Rajendra Govind Kolvekar Vs the Deputy Commissioner