M/S Hari Veda It Parks Pvt. Ltd, Vs the State of… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

M/S Hari Veda It Parks Pvt. Ltd, Vs the State of… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:49206 WP No. 13294 of 2023

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13294 OF 2023 (GM-KIADB)

BETWEEN:

M/S HARI VEDA IT PARKS PVT LTD, REG NO.572, C BLOCK, AECS LAYOUT, KUNDALAHALLI, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU – 560 037 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. GADDAM VEERA REDDY

REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAJASHEKER M B., ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, H O NO.49, 4^TH & 5^TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN, EAST WING,

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:49206 WP No. 13294 of 2023

HC-KAR

RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001

THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.14/3, 2^ND FLOOR, ARAVINDA BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA UDYOGA MITHRA, KHANIJA BHAVANA, 3^RD FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3; SMT. SUKRUTHA R, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION FILED ON 10.06.2019 AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND PLAN VIDE ANNEXURES-G1 & G2; b) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED DECISIONS OF 138^TH SLWSCC SL.NO.7.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J, DATED 07/03/2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4; c) ISSUE ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED JUST AND PROPER IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; d) ALLOW THIS WRIT PETITION WITH COST AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

3 -

NC: 2025:KHC:49206 WP No. 13294 of 2023

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties.

In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the decision of 138^th State Level Single Window Clearance Committee (SLSWCC) held on 07.03.2023 (Annexure-J), inter alia sought for direction to respondent No.3 to consider the building plan approval application dated 10.06.2019 (AnnexureG1).

Sri.B.B.Patil, learned counsel representing respondent Nos.2 and 3 KIADB, brought to the notice of the Court with regard to Section 18 of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002, wherein the decision taken by the State Level Single Window Clearance Committee is appealable to the Appellate Authority under the aforementioned act. Hence, he sought for dismissal of the petition.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 vehemently contended for the dismissal of the writ petition.

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:49206 WP No. 13294 of 2023

HC-KAR

Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the building plan as well as the approval as per Annexure-J made by the petitioner has been rejected and the petitioner is having efficacious remedy under Section 18 of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent Appellate Authority for redressal of the grievance. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of .

SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19