Dismissed¶30

The Karnataka State Khadi v. Shri K.Ramaiah

Karnataka HC27 Oct 2025WP/11770/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 11770 of 2015 (L-RES); decided 27.10.2025 by Jyoti Mulimani, J.; dismissal for non-prosecution of decade-old writ petition (filed 2015); petitioner (Khadi and Village Industries Board) absent and unrepresented, advocate marked absent; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; pending interlocutory applications disposed; interim directions discharged; no precedent engaged; NC: 2025:KHC:42508.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution, pending interlocutory applications disposed of and interim direction, if any, discharged. ¶30

The Karnataka State Khadi Vs Shri K.Ramaiah — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:42508 WP No. 11770 of 2015

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 11770 OF 2015 (L-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

THE KARNATAKA STATE KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, KHADI BHAVAN, NO.10, JASMA BHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 052. REPRESENTED BY: THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. PRAKASH T.HEBBAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SHRI. K.RAMAIAH, S/O. KALAIAH, MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.221, BADANVAL POST, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT.

¶14

THE MANAGER BADANWAL COMPOSITE CENTRE, KARNATAKA STATE VILLAGE, INDUSTRIES BOARD, BADANWAL, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. [DELETED AS PER ORDER DATED-21.07.1993]

¶15

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC:42508 WP No. 11770 of 2015

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

KHADI AND GRAMODHAYOG SAHAKARA SANGHA HOLENARASIPURA BRANCH HOLENARASIPUR REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SMT. VIDYA JAHAGIRDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. MANJULADEVI R.KAMADOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. P.NATARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R2 SERVED)

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

¶25

Smt.Vidya Jahagirdhar., counsel on behalf of Smt.Manjuladevi R.Kamadolli., for respondent No.1 has appeared in person.

¶26

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 10.10.2025, on that day, at request the matter was ordered to be listed on 27.10.2025.

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:42508 WP No. 11770 of 2015

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

The petition is listed today. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in 2015. Now we are in the month of October, 2025. The petition is pending from a decade. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶30

Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged.

¶31

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶32

MRP,KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12.1

The Karnataka State Khadi v. Shri K.Ramaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Karnataka State Khadi v. Shri K.Ramaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Mariyamma Vs Smt Parvathamma

Muthoot Fincorp Ltd. Vs Mr. Gajanan N Shetty

Smt. Parvathamma Vs Smt. Venkatamma

The Karnataka State Khadi Vs Shri Muniyayya

Durga Das Vs the Central Silk Board

Tumkur Coffee and Other Employees Sangha (R) Vs M/S Neelagiri Coffee