Mr Rajesh Sethuraman v. M/S Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 11441 of 2025 (GM-DRT); S Sunil Dutt Yadav, J.; decided 11 June 2025. Petitioners Rajesh Sethuraman and Anuradha Rajesh; respondent Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (trustee of EARC Trust). Article 226 writ seeking direction to DRT-II Bangalore to consider modification application dtd 14.04.2025 for extension of time to pay Rs. 40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs Only), 2nd part of interim order in S.A. No. 80/2025 (Annexure-F). Counsel's memo: balance amount paid to Debts Recovery Tribunal, petition infructuous, withdrawal sought. Memo taken on record; writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No merits decided, no cases cited, no dissent.
What did the court decide?
Taking on record the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners stating that, by virtue of payment of the balance amount as directed by the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Tribunal, the relief sought did not survive and the petition had become infructuous, the Court dismissed the writ petition in light of the memo and submission made.