Shri.Basaveshwar Vidhyavardhak Sangh Badachi Vs the District Registrar of Society and

SHRI.BASAVESHWAR VIDHYAVARDHAK SANGH BADACHI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI, RETED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI.MAN.NIRANJANA PRANAVA SWARUPI MAHASWAMIJIGULU, SHRI.GURULINGADEVARU AKKIMATH, AND ALSO BADACHI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591304.

¶10

VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL

¶11

Digitally signed byVISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court ofKarnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.12.11 16:18:12 +0530

¶12

SHRI.BASAVESHWAR VIDHYAVARDHAK SANGH BADACHI TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI, RETED BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI.SHIVAKUMAR S/O. SHIVAJIRAO DESAI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY, R/O: BADACHI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591304.

¶13

…PETITIONERS

¶14

(BY SRI. MAHANTESH R. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶15

2 -

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

AND:

¶19

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETY and DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-580001.

¶20

SRI.GOUDAPPA S/O APPASAB SAMAGOUD, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALLEGED PRESIDENT OF SHRI.BASAVESHWAR VIDHYAVARDHAK SANGH, R/O: BADACHI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591304.

¶21

THE ENQUIRY OFFICER, SRI. BASAVESHWAR VIDHYAVARDHAK SANGH, BADACHI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SMT. NANDINI SOMAPUR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3-SERVED)

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED:26.10.2018 BEARING NO.NILL PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-'Q' BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.,

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

3 -

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

¶31

The petitioners are before this Court seeking the

¶32

following prayer:

¶33

(a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the impugned order passed by the Respondent No.1 dated 26.10.2018 bearing No.NIL produced at Annexure-'Q' by allowing the writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶34

(b) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the impugned report dated 26.10.2018 passed by the Respondent No.3 produced at Annexure-'P' by allowing the writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶35

(c) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the impugned notice issued by Respondent No.2 dated 27.10.2018 produced at Annexure-'S' by allowing the writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶36

(d) Issue such other writ or orders or direction that may deemed proper and necessary under the facts and circumstances of the case, be issued in the interest of justice.

¶37

Petitioner No.1 is claiming to be the President of respondent No.3 – Society, communicates list of office bearers of the petitioners, which is said to have been approved by respondent No.2. Respondents Nos.4 to 12 are alleged to have created certain documents without notice to the petitioners and

¶38

4 -

¶39

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

other members. Respondent No.2 – the District Registrar of Cooperative Societies is said to have initiated proceedings under Section 25 and delegates, the conduct of the enquiry, to an enquiry officer appointed. The enquiry officer appointed submits his report. On the report, the District Registrar is said to have communicated to the Society to hold elections in terms of the report of the enquiry officer. It is at that stage the petitioners are before this Court eight years ago and further proceedings have remained stayed.

¶42

Learned counsel Shri Shivaraj Mudhol appearing for the petitioners submits that the role of the District Registrar on the enquiry report is only like a postman that he would only communicate the report of the enquiry officer to the Society for further action.

¶43

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would however refute the submission in contending that the District Register is required to verify the veracity of the findings in the enquiry officer's report and then communicate whether elections have to be held or otherwise.

¶44

5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶45

HC-KAR

¶46

Therefore, the issue now lies whether the District Register on the report of the enquiry officer appointed by him, is merely a postman to communicate it to the Society or has to consider the findings and then communicate after knowing the veracity of the allegations.

¶47

The issue lies in a narrow compass. Rule 8 of the

¶48

Karnataka Societies Registration Rules, 1961, reads as follows.

¶49

“8. Enquiry by the Registrar.- (1) Where the Registrar proposed to hold an enquiry under Section 25, either on his own motion or on an application, he or the person authorised by him under the said section to hold an enquiry shall issue notice to the society concerned in this behalf.

¶50

(2) The said notice shall specify a date on which, place in which and the time at which, as also the matters in respect of which the enquiry will be held. The notice shall also call upon the society to furnish its explanation in respect of matters referred to therein before the elate specified in the notice.

¶51

(3) The society shall furnish its explanation to the Registrar or the authorised person before such date.

¶52

(4) On the date fixed for the enquiry, or on such other date or dates to which the enquiry might be adjourned, the Registrar or the authorised person shall give the society a oral hearing. He may also examine such persons as may be considered necessary. He may receive any relevant document. If the society fails to furnish its explanation as required under sub-rule (3) or to attend the enquiry on the date fixed or the adjourned date, the Registrar or the authorised person may proceed with the enquiry ex parte.

¶53

6 -

¶54

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶55

HC-KAR

¶56

(5) On the completion of the enquiry, the Registrar or the authorised person shall record his findings and communicate the same to the society concerned].”

¶57

(Emphasis supplied)

¶58

Rule 8 deals with the enquiry by the Registrar. When the Registrar proposes to hold an enquiry under Section 25 and either on his own motion or on an application or delegate the holding of an enquiry to another authority; sub Rule (5) of Rule 8 indicates that on completion of the enquiry, the Registrar or the authorized person shall record his findings and communicate the same to the Society concerned. In the case at hand, an enquiry under Section 25 is delegated to be conducted by the enquiry officer. Enquiry officer submits his report. The report is as

¶59

follows:

¶60

“8] CzÉÃ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 05-04-2017 gÀAzÀÄ dgÀÄVzÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ¸ÀªÀð ¸ÁzsÁgÀuÁ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ £ÉÆÃn¸ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 27-04-2017 gÀAzÀÄ dgÀÄVzÀ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ £ÀqÀÄªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ¤¹zÁUÀ PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÉÆÃµÀUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §gÀÄvÀÛªÉ.

¶61

i] ¢£ÁAPÀ: 05-04-2017 gÀ £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀAWÀzÀ J®è ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ eÁj ªÀiÁrzÀ §UÉÎ zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀ°è PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄÄ «¥sÀ®gÁVzÁÝgÉ.

¶62

ii] ¢£ÁAPÀ:27-04-2017 gÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ¸ÀªÀð ¸ÁzsÁgÀt ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ £ÀqÀÄªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁV ¸ÀAWÀzÀ MlÄÖ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ¸ÀASÉå 21 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÁdjzÀÝ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ¸ÀASÉå: 21 JAzÀÄ vÉÆÃj¹zÁÝgÉ. EzÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ¤¹zÀgÉÃ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀÄ G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 28 gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ J®è zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À ¸Áé¢üÃ£ÀvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢zÀ PÁAiÀiÁðzsÀåPÀëgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀQð¹ J®è ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ AiÀiÁ¢ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀzÉÃ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀjAzÀ ¸ÀªÀð¸ÁzsÁgÀt ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ £ÀqÀÄªÀ½ ¥ÀÅ¸ÀÛPÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄzÉÃ £À¨sÉAiÀÄ £ÀqÀÄªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÁR°¹zÀÄÝ PÀAqÀÄ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

¶63

7 -

¶64

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶65

HC-KAR

¶66

iii] d£ÀgÀ ºÁdgÁw vÉÆÃj¸ÀÄªÀ F ¸À¨sÉUÉ ºÁdgÁzÀªÀgÀ°è CzsÀåPÀë ºÁUÀÆ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ£ÀÄß M¼ÀUÉÆAqÀÄ 05 d£ÀgÀÄ C¢üÃPÀÈvÀªÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆÃAzÀtÂ PÁAiÉÄÝ 1960 gÀ PÀ®A 2 [J] ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÉÃ EgÀÄªÀÅ¢¯Áè,

¶67

iv] D ¢£ÁAPÀzÀAzÀÄ 99 d£À ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ EgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ°è PÉÃªÀ® 10 d£À ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ ºÁdjzÀÝjAzÀ G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄ £ÀA. 9 ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ PÉÆÃgÀA ¥ÀÇwðAiÀiÁUÀÄªÀÅ¢¯Áè.

¶68

v] F ªÉÄÃ°£À CA±ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 05-04-2017 gÀ £ÉÆÃn¸ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 27-04-2017 oÀ ¸ÀªÀð¸ÁzsÁgÀt ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄÄ JgÀqÀÄ C£ÀÆfðvÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîvÀÛªÉ. DzÀÝjAzÀ F ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ oÀgÁªÀÅ £ÀA. 3 gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ dgÀÄVzÉ J£Àß¯ÁzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ DAiÉÄÌAiÀÄÄ ¹AzsÀÄªÁUÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.

¶69

9] DzÀÝjAzÀ ¥ÀæZÀ°vÀ G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÁAiÀiÁðzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ vÀéjvÀªÁV ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¸ÀªÀð¸ÁzsÁgÀt ¸À¨sÉ PÀgÉzÀÄ ¸ÀA¥ÀzÀ G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ C¢üÃPÀÈvÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ gÀZÀ£É ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ«zÉ JAzÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀlÄÖ F «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆÃAzÁuÁ¢üPÁj¼ÀÆ DzÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ¨É¼ÀUÁ« EªÀjUÉ EAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:26-10-2018 gÀAzÀÄ ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVzÉ.”

¶70

8. The enquiry officer recommends that elections have

¶71

to be conducted to the Society. This is placed before the District Registrar. The action to be taken is under sub-rule (5) of Rule 8

¶72

of the Rules by the District Registrar is as follows:

¶73

“UÉ CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ, §¸ÀªÉÃ±ÀégÀ «zÁåªÀzsÀðPÀ ¸ÀAWÀ. §qÀa vÁ॥ CxÀtÂ. f¯Áè ¨É¼ÀUÁ«. «µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆAzÀtÂ PÁAiÉÄÝ-1960 gÀ PÀ®A 25 gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ.

¶74

G¯ÉèÃR: 1] F PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉÃ±À PÀæ.¸À.r.Dgï.J¯ï/ J¸ï N.Dgï/ «ZÁgÀuÉ 28/2018-19 : 22/09/2018.

¶75

2] «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÀgÀ¢ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26/10/2018.

¶76

ªÉÄÃ¯ÁÌtÂ¹zÀ «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ²æÃ. §¸ÀªÉÃ±ÀégÀ «zÁåªÀzsÀðPÀ ¸ÀAWÀ §qÀa F ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ±Á¸À£À §zÀÞ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ G¯ÉèÃR (1) ¥ÀæPÁgÀ F PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄ¢AzÀ DzÉÃ±À

¶77

8 -

¶78

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶79

HC-KAR

¶80

ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ CzÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ G¯ÉèÃR (2) gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ vÀªÀÄä ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß F PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄPÉÌ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26/10/2018 gÀAzÀÄ ¸À°è¹zÁÝgÉ ¸ÀzÀjÃ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆAzÀtÂ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1961 gÀ gÀÆ® 8/5 gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ PÀ½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

¶81

f¯Áè ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆAzÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ ¨É¼ÀUÁ«.”

¶82

As observed hereinabove, the District Registrar under

¶83

the scheme of the statute cannot act as, only a postman. The rule is unequivocal. The rule indicates that on completion of enquiry the Registrar or the authorized person shall record his findings and communicate the same to the Society. If the finding of the District Registrar as quoted herein above is considered on the bedrock of the mandate of the Rule, it would undoubtedly fall foul of the same, for the reason that the communication of the District Registrar does not indicate even a semblance of application of mind. What has come from the enquiry, he has enclosed it and sent it. But the rule is indicative of the fact that the authorized person shall record his findings and communicate the same to the Society. There is not a line of finding recorded by the District Registrar, while communicating the same to the Society.

¶84

Therefore, the action of the District Registrar is in violation of sub-rule (5) of Rule 8 of the Rules. The District

¶85

9 -

¶86

NC: 2025:KHC-D:17323 WP No. 107499 of 2018

¶87

HC-KAR

¶88

Registrar shall now redo the exercise on receipt of the enquiry report and communicate the same to the Society, if need would still subsists.

¶89

For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

¶90

ORDER

¶91

(i) The writ petition is allowed in part.

¶92

(ii) The impugned order passed by respondent No.1, dated 26.10.2018 vide Annexure-Q; the impugned report passed by respondent No.3, dated 26.10.2018 vide Annexure-P; and the impugned notice issued by respondent No.2, dated 27.10.2018 vide Annexure-S stand quashed.

¶93

(iii) The matter is remitted back to the hands of the District Registrar to consider the report of the enquiry officer dated 26.10.2018 and pass necessary orders communicating it to the Society, bearing in mind the observations made in the course of the order.

¶94

Ordered accordingly.

¶95

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶96

VNP / CT: ANB

¶97

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2.2

Shri.Basaveshwar Vidhyavardhak Sangh Badachi v. the District Registrar of Society and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri.Basaveshwar Vidhyavardhak Sangh Badachi v. the District Registrar of Society and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yasin Khan S/O Ahmed Khan Mudugal Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt.Inayathunnisa Vs the State of Karnataka

Yuvaraj S/O Ramu Shinde Vs the State of Karnataka

Narayan Green Private Limited Vs Union of India

Sri. Goudappa S/O Appasab Samagond Vs the State of Karnataka

Shri.Basaveshwar Vidhyavardhak Sangh, Badachi Vs the State of Karnataka