Disposed¶32

Shri. Channayya S/O Mallayya Hiremath v. P.S.I Ankalgi Police Station

Karnataka HC15 Apr 2025WP/104932/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

rowdy-sheeter; recommendation report; Annexure-C; writ of certiorari; Articles 226 and 227; GM-POL; preliminary hearing B group; Gokak; Belagavi; Ankalgi police station; Suldal Gram Panchayat ex-President; disposed; Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench; Jyoti Mulimani; 14.03.2016; Santosh B. Rawoot; Praveen K. Uppar AGA.

What did the court decide?

Annexure-C is only a recommendation and the petitioner cannot have any grievance about the same. ¶4

Shri. Channayya S/O Mallayya Hiremath Vs P.S.I… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:6394 WP No. 104932 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶4

DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 104932 OF 2017 (GM-POL)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SHRI. CHANNAYYA S/O MALLAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND EX-PRESIDENT OF SULDAL GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O: SULDAL, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. SANTOSH.B.RAWOOT., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

P.S.I ANKALGI POLICE STATION, TQ:GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI.

¶15

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

THE ASSISTANT SUB-INSPECTOR, GOKAK, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI.

¶17

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DIST: BELAGAVI.

¶18

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANSOUDA, BENGALURU.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA)

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6394 WP No. 104932 of 2017

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Sri.Santosh B.Rawoot., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person.

¶26

The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the recommendation report dated:14.03.2016 issued by respondent No.1 to respondent No.2 vide Annexure-C.

¶27

Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.

¶28

A perusal of Annexure-C reflects that it is only a recommendation and the petitioner cannot have any grievance about the same. If at all, the name of the petitioner is included

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC-D:6394 WP No. 104932 of 2017

¶31

in the rowdy-sheeter, he is at a liberty to question the same before the appropriate forum, if so advised.

¶32