Dismissed¶36

Mr Shabbir Rasulsab Mujawar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Jun 2025WP/104110/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; challenge to updation of revenue entries; land Sy. No. 850/1A, Telsang/Telasanga village, Athani taluk, Belagavi district; Karnataka State Wakf Board; Peer Haji Saheb Dargah (Sunni); MR H205/2011-12 Release of Rights dated 03.02.2012; Annexure-A; Tahsildar respondent No.4; prayer for mandamus to restore petitioner's father's name; repeated absence of petitioner and counsel despite last chances on 04.04.2025 and 03.06.2025; no merits decided; single judge (Pradeep Singh Yerur J.), Dharwad Bench, decided 18.06.2025.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mr Shabbir Rasulsab Mujawar Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7787 WP No. 104110 of 2024

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 104110 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

MR. SHABBIR RASULSAB MUJAWAR, SON OF RASULAB MUJAWAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. TELSANG, ATHANI TALUK, BELAGAVI-591 265.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. A.S. ZUBAIR AHMED KHAN, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶12

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶13

VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI

¶14

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶15

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, TELASANGA, ATHANI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-591304.

¶17

THE KARNATAKA STATE WAKF BOARD, DARULAWKAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560052, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.

¶18

PEER HAJI SAHEB DARGAH (SUNNI), TELASANGA, ATHANI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT -593104, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. M.M. KHANNUR, AGA FOR R1-R4)

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7787 WP No. 104110 of 2024

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

¶24

a) ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED UPDATION OF REVENUE ENTRIES IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY. NO. 850/1A, MEASURING 4 ACRES 3 GUNTAS, SITUATED TELASANG VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ATHANI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 IN FAVOUR OF THE KARNATAKA STATE WAKF BOARD, BENGALURU AND PEER HAJI SAHEB DARGAH (SUNNI), THE RESPONDENT NO.5 AND 6 HEREIN VIDE MR H205/2011-12 (RELEASE OF RIGHTS) DATED 03.02.2012 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.

¶25

b) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO RESTORE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER’S FATHER IN RESPECT SCHEDULE PROPERTY BEARING SY. NO.850/1A, MEASURING 4 ACRES 34 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT TELASANG VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ATHANI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT BY DELETING THE NAME OF THE RESPONDENT NOS.5 AND 6.

¶26

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)

¶29

Learned AGA is directed to take notice for the respondents.

¶30

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner,

¶31

when the matter is called out at 3.20 pm.

¶32

The matter has been adjourned by granting time to the petitioner to rectify the objections. On 04.04.2025, the

¶33

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7787 WP No. 104110 of 2024

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

matter was adjourned granting time to the petitioner to comply, as a last chance. Again on 03.06.2025, the matter was adjourned granting two weeks’ time, failing which, the matter was ordered to be listed for dismissal. Hence the matter is come up today. But again there is no representation.

¶36

Hence the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶37

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

¶38

gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Mr Shabbir Rasulsab Mujawar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mr Shabbir Rasulsab Mujawar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Murudeshwar Ceramics Ltd, Vs the Commissioner

Chanakya Enterprises Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Shakti Trading Company Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt.Sarojavva W/O Shankarappa Kambali Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Kristappa S/O Late Sri v Thimmappa Vs the Deputy Director Department

Basamma D/O Ayyanagouda Malipatil Vs M/S Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.