Sayed Nisar Ali S/O Syed Naseer Ali v. Director of Municipal Administration

Karnataka HC11 Jul 2025WP/103473/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 103473 of 2018 (S-RES); Sayed Nisar Ali v. Director of Municipal Administration & others; High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench; decided 11-07-2025 by Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur; writ of certiorari; writ of mandamus; Annexure-H notice dated 17.05.2018; Kushtagi Town Police Station; Town Panchayat Mudgal/Tavaragera, Koppal; dismissed as not pressed on counsel's memo (Smt. Sunitha P. Kalasoor); HCGP Sri. P.N. Hatti for R1, R2 & R4; notice to R3 served; Articles 226 and 227; no merits adjudicated; no quantum; minimal precedential value.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sayed Nisar Ali S/O Syed Naseer Ali Vs Director… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8611 WP No. 103473 of 2018

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF JULY 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 103473 OF 2018 (S-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SAYED NISAR ALI S/O. SYED NASEER ALI, AGED: 46 YEARS, OCC: TAX INSPECTOR, GRADE-II, NOW AT TOWN PANCHAYAT, TAVARAGERI, DIST: KOPPAL-583231.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SMT. SUNITHA P. KALASOOR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, V.V. TOWERS, AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU.

¶13

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAICHUR-584101.

¶14

CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN PANCHAYAT MUDGAL, TAVARAGERA, DIST: KOPPAL.

¶15

VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI

¶16

Digitally signed byVIJAYALAKSHMI MKANKUPPI Location: High Court ofKarnataka, Dharwad BenchDate: 2025.07.16 14:35:15+0530

¶17

KUSHTAGI TOWN POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1, R2 & R4; NOTICE TO R3 SERVED)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

¶21

a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED:17.05.2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H ISSUE BY RESPONDENT NO.4.

¶22

b) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE 4^TH RESPONDENT TO NOT TO ISSUE ANY SUCH IMPUGNED NOTICES PRODUCED AT

¶23

¶24

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8611 WP No. 103473 of 2018

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

ANNEXURE-H WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE DUE PROCEDURE OF LAW.

¶27

c) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE 4^TH RESPONDENT NOT TO TRESPASS THE AUTHORITY AND THE POWER WITH THEM BY ISSUING THE AFORESAID IMPUGNED NOTICE AND ETC.

¶28

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

( PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking

¶32

to dismiss the petition as not pressed.

¶33

Memo and submissions are placed on record.